Running Head: Reading Comprehension: Reviving the Sentence Verification Technique

Authors

  • Nisha Vidyasagar CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru.
  • Sudha Bhogle Eduquity Career Technologies, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.24.1

Keywords:

Reading comprehension research, Reading Assessment, reading comprehension in the elementary grades, Sentence verification technique

Abstract

Reading success is largely determined by reading comprehension. Thus accurate assessment of reading comprehension is necessary to identify those who require remediation and to plan future instructions in classrooms. Sentence verification technique (SVT) is one of the methods of assessing comprehension and can function as a diagnostic tool in reading assessment. The aim of the current study was to determine whether the SVT could detect gender and grade differences in reading comprehension. The study targeted 1091 elementary grade students comprising both boys and girls who were assessed using the SVT. The students read two text passages selected according to their grade level and responded to four sentence types - original, paraphrase, meaning change and distracter sentences. Independent sample t test highlighted that girls were significantly better than boys with regard to reading comprehension ability. One way analysis of variance to analyse grade differences indicated that there were significant improvements in reading comprehension ability with higher grades, thus highlighting the sensitivity of SVTs in detecting developmental changes in reading comprehension. The findings of this study emphasize the diagnostic potential of the SVTs with regard to identifying children with reading comprehension difficulties which in turn would help in planning their remediation. These SVTs can be easily developed by school teachers and other non-psychometricians for the purpoe of identifying students requiring assistance. The paper will discuss the finding, purpose and uses of SVT along with its classroom implications.

Author Biographies

Nisha Vidyasagar, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru.

Research Scholar in Department of Psychology, Christ University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Sudha Bhogle, Eduquity Career Technologies, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Professor of Psychology and Head, Student Solution, Eduquity Career Technologies, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

References

Anders, P. (2002). Towards an understanding of the development of reading comprehension instruction across the grade levels. In C. Roller (Ed.), Comprehensive reading instruction across the grade levels: A collection of papers from the Reading Research 2001 conference, (pp.111-132). Newark: International Reading Association.

Beech, J. & Singleton, C. (1997). The psychological assessment of reading. London: Routledge.

Canadian Council on Learning. Lessons in Learning. (2009, February 18). Why boys don't like to read: gender differences in reading achievement. Retrieved from http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/Lessons inLearning/ 02_18_09-E.pdf

Child Health News (2004, May 12). New research finds that boys really do have more reading problems than girls. Retrieved January 14, 2013, from NewsMedical: http://www.news-medical.net/news/ 2004/ 05/ 12/ 1493. aspx

Dhar, A. (2012, January 16). Indian students fare poorly in international evaluation tests. The Hindu. Retrieved from http:// www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2804134.ece.

Fletcher, J. (2006). Measuring reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading,10(3), 323-330.

Hess, K. (2007). Reading development and assessment of early literacy: A review of literature. Utah: Utah Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.schools.utah.gov/eval/documents/Lit_Early LiteracyReview.pdf

Lietz, P. (2006). A meta-analysis of gender differences of reading achievement at the secondary school level. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32 (4), 317-344.doi10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.10.002

McNamara, D. C. &Kendeou, P. (2011). Translating advances in reading comprehension research to educational practice. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 33-46. Retrieved from http://www.iejee.com/4_1_2011/3_IEJEE_4_1_McNamara_Kendeou.pdf

Moats, L. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of the spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 81-102. DOI 10.1007/s11145-009-9162-1

OECD (2010), PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf

Palmer, M. (1997). A comparative study of listening and reading comprehension in children of different age-groups. Pretoria: University of Pretoria. Retrieved January 14, 2013, from http://upetd.up.ac.za/ thesis/ available/etd-10292012-163947/ >

Rice, M. (2009). Making connections: Reading comprehension skills and strategies. Educators Publishing Service. Retrieved from http:// eps.schoolspecialty.com/downloads/research_papers/mc_research.pdf

Royer, J. M., Greene, B.A., & Sinatra, G.M. (1987). The SVT: A practical procedure for testing comprehension. Journal of Reading, 30, 412-422.

Royer, J. M., Hastings, C.N., & Hooks, C. (1979). A sentence verification technique for measuring reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 11, 355-363.

Wheldall, K. A. (2010). Do more boys than girls have reading problems? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(5), 418-429. doi: 10.1177/ 0022219409355477

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01