Some Observations on the Middle Palaeolithic Culture in North-Western Karnataka with Special Reference to the Site of Kovalli

Authors

  • Sony J Mathew Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, Pune-411006.
  • Sushama G Deo Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, Pune-411006

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.22.6

Keywords:

Assemblage, Middle Palaeolithic, Naturally backed knife, Palaeolithic

Abstract

The Middle Palaeolithic culture has been widely distributed in the Ghataprabha basin, obtained from 113 sites. The majority of the sites are concentrated in the middle and lower reaches of the river Ghataprabha and the assemblage is comprised of scrapers of various types, points, borers and scraper cum borer and borer cum points. The studies conducted at the site Kovalli which lies in the lower reaches of Ghataprabha suggest that the Kovalli assemblage can be categorized as mixture of Middle Palaeolithic and late Middle Palaeolithic. It can be categorized as “advanced” Middle Palaeolithic.

Author Biographies

Sony J Mathew, Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, Pune-411006.

Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, Pune-411006.

Sushama G Deo, Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, Pune-411006

Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, Pune-411006

References

Banerjee, K. D. (1957). Middle Palaeolithic industries of the deccan. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Pune.

Barkai, R. A., Gopher., & Ron. S., (2006). Middle pleistocene blade production in the levant: An amudian assemblage from Qesem cave. Israel. Eurasian Prehistory, 3(2), 39-74.

Foote, R. B. (1876). The Geological features of the south Maratha country and adjacent districts. In Memories of Geological Survey of India 12(1).

Ghosh, A. K. (1972). Flake and flake-blade industries in India in the context of human evolution. In B A K F (Ed.), The Origin of Homosapiens (pp. 95-100).

H. V. A. James & M. D. Petraglia. (2005). Modern human origins and the evolution and behaviour in the later pleistocene record of South Asia. Current Anthropology. 46. Supplement: S1-S27. Indian arachaeology: A review, 1955-56. p. 5, New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.

Misra, V. N. (1962). Problems of terminology in Indian Prehistory, The Eastern Anthropologist 15(2). Pp 113-24.

Paddayya, K. (1984). India. neue forschungen zur-Altsteinzeit. O. Bar-Yosef, (Ed.), pp. 345-403. Munchen: Verlag C. H. Beck.

Paddayya, K. (2008). Palaeolithic cultures in encyclopaedia of archaeology. Vol. 1. Deborah M. P. (Eds.) pp. 768-791. Oxford. Elsevier & Academic Press.

Paddayya, K. (2011). Stone age technology in India. Ancient India 1: pp 9-68.

Pal, J. N. (2002). The Middle palaeolithic culture of South Asia in (Indian Archaeology in Retrospect. (1): Preshistory. Korisetter & S. Setter (Eds.)). pp. 67-83. New Delhi. Manohar Publishers.

Pappu, R. S. & Deo, S. (1994). Man-land relationship during palaeolithic times in the kaladgi basin-Karnataka. Pune. Deccan College.

Pappu, R. S. (1974). Pleistocene studies in the upper krishna basin. Pune. Deccan College.

Rama Rao, B. (1961). A Handbook of geology of Mysore State. Bangalore: Bangalore printing and publishing company.

Sankalia, H. D. (1964). Middle stone age cultures in India and Pakistan. Science. 146. pp. 365-375.

Sushama, G. D. (1991). Geomorphic Study of The Palaeolithic Settlement in the Ghattaprabha basin, Karnataka. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Pune.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-29