Analyzing the Role of the Goods and Service Tax Network in Helping the State Preserve a Just Social Order

Authors

  • Kothandaraman Sethuraman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.17.2

Keywords:

Algorithms, Article 279A, Constitution, Good Governance, Institutions of National Life

Abstract

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) manages the Common GST Electronic Portal. The payment of money, inclusive of the Goods and Services Taxes (GSTs), is made to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in three different ways – It can first be deposited as revenue in compliance with law; it can also be deposited after collection, following notices of demand; and finally it can be deposited after recovery from defaulters, into the respective Consolidated Funds, which are mutually independent parts of central and state treasuries. GST revenues accounted for in the Consolidated Funds would have to be correct, complete and uncontested. The GSTN thereafter manages the digital facilitation of the registration, furnishing returns, computation and settlement of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST), electronic way bill and other functions if prescribed in accordance with law. This paper examines if the functioning of the GSTN within the framework of the Constitution, would enable the State to apply the Directive Principles of State Policy, which guide governance in India, to secure and preserve a just social order.

References

§146, The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, No. 10 of 2017, INDIA CODE (2017), http://gstcouncil.gov.in/meetings

INDIA CONST. art. 279A, cl. (1)

G.S.R. 606(E), Central Goods and Service Tax, Ministry of Finance, Notification No. 4/2017

§8, Companies Act, No. 18 of 2013, INDIA CODE (2013)

Government of Andhra Pradesh GO MS No.225, 22 June 2017, https://www.apct.gov.in/gstportal/GST_Portal/table_rn.aspx?uid=Tax+Notification

See INDIA CONST. art. 279A, cl. (4); K. Sethuraman Levy of Goods and Services Tax: When and Where of Taxable Events, https://business-of-government.com/rev-1levy-of-goods-and-services-tax when-and-where-of-taxable-events/

INDIA CONST., art. 269A, cl. (4)(c)

INDIA CONST., art. 37

INDIA CONST., art. 38

INDIA CONST., art. 39

Jon Kleinberg, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, Cass R. Sunstein, Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms http//www.nber.org/ papers/ w25548

INDIA CONST., art. 38

Gerard Debreu, The Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, 2 (1959)

The Central Sales Tax Act,1956 https:// indiacode.nic.in/ handle/ 123456789/2484?sam_handle=123456789/1362

Incoterm 2020, International Chamber of Commerce, https:// iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/incoterms-2020/

Yoram Barzel, Economic Analysis of Property Rights, 3 (1997)

Douglass C North, Institutions,Institutional Change and Economic Performance, 1, 1990.

Supra Deubreu at 33

INDIA CONST., art. 279A

Leonard Herwicz, Stanley Reiker, Designing Economic Mechanisms, 4 (2006)

INDIA CONST., art. 38

R.A. Musgrave, P.B. Musgrave, Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 221 (1984).

Rakesh Vohra, Mechanism Design: A Linear Programming Approach, 3 (2011).

INDIA CONST., art. 261

INDIA CONST., art. 258

INDIA CONST., art. 258A

Supra Kleinberg at 16

Id.

Id

INDIA CONST., art. 39, cl. (b)

INDIA CONST., art. 39, cl. (c)

INDIA CONST, List III, Entry 2, 13

INDIA CONST art 114 cl (3), art 204 cl (3), 266 cl (3)

INDIA CONST., art. 366

Jean Jacques Laffont and David Martimort, Theory of Incentives, (2002).

See Bolton and Dewatripont, Contract Theory (2005).

Id. at 23

See K. Sethuraman, Constitutional Accountability for India's Goods and Services tax Revenues After the July 2017 Reform,4 Aarthika Charche No1, 21, 34

Id.

Supra Vohra at 23

Daven R Desai, Joshua A Kroll, Trust, but Verify: A Guide to Algorithms and Law, 31 Harvard Journal Of Law And Technology 1, 64

Supra Kleinberg at 11

Id.

Supra Debreu at 2

Downloads

Published

2020-07-01

How to Cite

Sethuraman, K. (2020). Analyzing the Role of the Goods and Service Tax Network in Helping the State Preserve a Just Social Order . Christ University Law Journal, 9(2), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.17.2