Bilateral Investment Treaties and Sovereignty: An Analysis with Respect to International Investment Law

  • Joseph Thaliath National Law University, Jodhpur

Abstract

International law as a governing institution, has gained prominence, with the advent of globalization. This is of specific relevance for the governance of state-market relations. Nowhere has this been as pronounced as in the international investment regime. Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) have today become some of the most potent legal tools underwriting economic globalization. These are established through pacts, which have to be adhered to, through all stages of performance of the treaty. This paper argues against the shift of bilateral investment treaties (BIT) from a pro-sovereign, to a pro-investor approach. It does so by explaining the present situation of bilateral investment treaties while pointing out their disadvantages. The basic idea of a BIT is questioned in order to understand its purpose and examines its failure in achieving the same. The partial approach towards the investors by the tribunals, is frowned upon and the lack of justifications and defenses on the part of the state is reviewed. Modest suggestions on improving this situation are provided by using cases decided by tribunals at an international level, taking up the example of Argentina.

##submission.authorBiography##

##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

Fourth year, BSc LLB (Hons.), National Law University, Jodhpur

Published
2016-07-01
How to Cite
THALIATH, Joseph. Bilateral Investment Treaties and Sovereignty: An Analysis with Respect to International Investment Law. Christ University Law Journal, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 1-8, july 2016. ISSN 2278-4322. Available at: <http://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/culj/article/view/994>. Date accessed: 21 jan. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.9.1.