Ways of Being of Equipment: A Heideggerian Enquiry into Design Process

  • Honeylal Puthussery Satya Nilayam Research Institute


The paper lays out an ontological enquiry into the ways of ‘being of equipment’ as analysed by Heidegger and its role in understanding the design process. Equipments are things that make up our world. It is hard to imagine living without things because our existence is thingly textured. Heidegger’s analytics of equipment far exceeds the ontic sense of things. The argument is that there is a danger when designers limit themselves with the ontic understanding of equipment. Such an understanding coaxes us to believe in the half-baked truth about equipment- an isolated instance of a piece of artifact and leave us ignorant of the equipment's character as a part of an equipment structure. An ontological reflection on equipment brings forth its relational nature and can be rewarding in several ways in improving its design process.



Satya Nilayam Research Institute (University of Madras)


Boedeker, Jr, E. C. (2005). Phenomenology. In H. Dreyfus & M. Wrathall (Eds.), A companion to Heidegger (pp. 156-172). Oxford: Blackwell.
Buckley, P. R. (1992). Husserl, Heidegger and the crisis of philosophical responsibility. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Dreyfus, H., & Kelly, S. (2011). All Things shining: reading the western classics to find meaning in a secular age. New York: Free Press.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). Holism and hermeneutics. The Review of Metaphysics, 34(1), 3-23.
Dreyfus, H. L. (2007). In H. L. Dreyfus (Ed.), Being-in-the-World 2. Philosophy 185 Heidegger. Berkeley: University of California.
Escobar, A. (2012). Ontology of design. (Unpublished Manuscript). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina. Retrieved from http://sawyerseminar.ucdavis.edu/files/2012/12/ESCOBAR_Notes-on-the-Ontology-of-Design-Parts-I-II-_-III.pdf
Feng, P., & Feenberg, A.(2008).Thinking about design: critical theory of technology and the design process. In P.E. Vermaas, P. Kroes, A. Light, & S. Moore (Eds.),Philosophy and design (pp. 105-118). Springer: Dordrecht.
Fry, T. (1999). A new design philosophy: an introduction to defuturing. Sidney: UNSW Press.
Hall, H. (1993). Intentionality and world: division of being and time. In C. B. Guignon (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger (pp. 122-140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harman, G. (2002). Tool-Being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Chicago: Open Court.
Harman, G. (2013). Heidegger explained from phenomenon to thing. Chicago: Open Court.
Heidegger, M. (1962). In J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson (Trans.), Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1988). In A. Hofstadter (Trans.), The basic problems of phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hernández, J. P. (2011). How presencing (Anwesen) became Heidegger's concept of being. Universit as Philosophica, 28(57), 213-240. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/unph/v28n57/v28n57a09.pdf
Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience. Albany: Suny Press.
Inwood, M. (1999). Heidegger dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Honeylal Puthussery Ways of Being of Equipment
Joronen, M. (2012). Heidegger on the history of machination. Critical horizons: A journal of Philosophy & Social Theory, 13, 351-376. doi: 10.1558/crit.v13i3.351.
Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Liberman, K. (2012).Heidegger‟s notion of Befindlichkeit and the meaning of “Situated” in social inquiries. In G. V. Bicocca, G. M. Campagnolo & Y. Curzi (Eds.), Phenomenology, organizational politics, and it design: the social study of information systems (pp. 47-55). Hershey: Information Science Reference.
McDaniel, K. (2013). Heidegger‟s metaphysics of material beings. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXXVII(2), 332-357. doi: 10.1111/phpr.12000.
Munday, R. (2006). On reading Being and Time: an explication and commentary Part 1, Division 3, Section 15. Retrieved from http://www.visualmemory.co.uk/b_resources/b_and_t_pt1_dv3_1.html#15.
Munday, R. (2009). Equipment, equipmentality, equipment structure. Glossary of terms in Being and Time. Retrieved from http:// www.visualmemory.co.uk/b_resources/b_and_t_glossary.html.
Riemer, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2011, December). Artifact or equipment? rethinking the core of IS using Heidegger’s ways of being. Paper presented at International Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai, China, December 4-7. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/ proceedings/researchmethods/5/
Riemer, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2014). Rethinking the place of the artefact in IS using Heidegger‟s analysis of equipment. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 273-288. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2013.5
Rojcewicz, R. (2006). The gods and technology. Albany: Suny Press.
Shields, C. (2007). Aristotle. New York: Taylor & Francis. (epub version)
Sinclair, M. (2006). Heidegger, Aristotle and the work of art. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wahl, D. (2016). Designing regenerative cultures. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
Wildman, W. J. (2010). An introduction to relational ontology. In John Polkinghorne (Ed.), The trinity and an entangled world: relationality in Physical Science and Theology (pp. 55-73). Michigan: Eerdmans Publishing Co.
How to Cite
PUTHUSSERY, Honeylal. Ways of Being of Equipment: A Heideggerian Enquiry into Design Process. Tattva - Journal of Philosophy, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 31-52, jan. 2019. ISSN 0975-332X. Available at: <http://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/1862>. Date accessed: 20 jan. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.12726/tjp.21.3.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plug-in to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.