@article{Deka_2021, title={Tracing Russell’s Views on the Relationship between Culture and Science as Intrinsically Linked through the Method of Analysis }, volume={12}, url={https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/2766}, DOI={10.12726/tjp.24.3}, abstractNote={<p>Bertrand Russell, while expressing his deep concern for a prevailing negligence about an <em>intrinsic</em> aspect of science, which he terms culture, opines that <em>culture</em> is not to be understood as something divorced from science. His demarcation of <em>old culture</em> from <em>young culture</em>; and his claim that it is the young culture which is responsible for valuing science for its <em>usefulness</em> rather than its <em>intrinsic </em>aspect, i.e., prepares the stage for arguing in favour of endorsement of cultural intrinsicality of science. The paper argues that viewed from Russell’s perspective, understanding culture as something unrelated to science will be a mistake, because it will carry a message to the mankind which is detrimental to the entire fabric of social cohesion. The paper focuses on the inculcation of <em>scientific habit</em>, an intrinsic aspect of science, as culture. While doing so, the paper intends to stress on the point that the <em>scientific</em> <em>habit, </em>which is linked to the Russellian method of <em>analysis</em>, common to both science and philosophy, plays a significant role in enabling one to focus on the cultural aspect of science. Analysis, in the province of philosophy, is used by Russell primarily to analyze <em>language</em>.</p>}, number={2}, journal={Tattva Journal of Philosophy}, author={Deka , Jahnabi}, year={2021}, month={Jan.}, pages={33-45} }