https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/issue/feedTattva Journal of Philosophy2024-05-20T08:56:34+00:00Mithilesh Kumarmithilesh.kumar@christuniversity.in Open Journal Systems<p>Tattva Journal of Philosophy seeks to facilitate critical study and in-depth reflection and analysis of issues, problems and concerns of human life, in order to further the directions and transformations human society needs to evolve into. It targets philosophers, educational institutions, research centres, social scientists, policymakers and any individual interested in and committed to human welfare.</p> <p>Tattva Journal of Philosophy is a <a href="https://ugccare.unipune.ac.in/Apps1/User/WebA/DesciplinewiseList?DiscpID=1&DiscpName=Arts%20and%20Humanities">UGC-CARE Listed Journal</a>. (<strong>Group I, Arts and Humanities</strong>)</p> <p><strong>Open Access Policy</strong>: This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the <a href="https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/">Budapest Open Access Initiative</a> (BOAI) definition of open access.</p> <p><strong>Peer Review Policy:</strong> <em>Tattva</em> Journal of Philosophy is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal.</p> <p><strong>Publication Charges Policy</strong>: <em>Tattva</em> Journal of Philosophy <em>does not levy any charges from the authors or from authors' institutions or from any funding agency for the publication of the articles. This includes article processing charges (APCs), submission charges, page charges, colour charges or any instance where money is required to complete the publication process. Tattva</em>Journal of Philosophy <em>is fully funded by CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India. </em></p>https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/5659Editorial2024-05-09T05:21:49+00:00Peter JonkersP.H.A.I.Jonkers@tilburguniversity.edu2024-05-20T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Peter Jonkershttps://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/3494Descartes and the Question of God's Existence 2022-06-05T07:20:04+00:00Thoibisana Akoijamakoijamthoibisana@gauhati.ac.in<p>When Antoine Arnauld in his <em>Fourth Set of Objections </em>to Descartes’ Meditations expressed the difficulty of accepting the certainty that <em>God exists only because we clearly and distinctly perceive this</em>, with the claim that, <em>what we clearly and distinctly perceive is true only because God exists; </em>he sets the structural problem of Cartesian epistemology, which is also popularly known as the Cartesian Circle. Descartes replied by drawing attention to the difference between <em>clear and distinct perceptions </em>to which one is actually attending and <em>clear and distinct perceptions </em>that one merely remembers having considered in the past. He claims that whereas the former sort of perception is beyond doubt, the latter cannot be trusted until it is established that a non-deceptive God exists. The controversy surrounding the Cartesian Circle has been reduced to the debates concerning the questions of whether Descartes was interested mainly in providing a psychologically stable system of beliefs, or if he wanted to establish that these beliefs correspond to reality. Hence, the underlying question concerning the Cartesian Circle, is whether Descartes is intended to provide a deep challenge to the reliability of <em>human cognition</em>, or he merely wanted to use the <em>skeptical process</em> to direct the reader to <em>clear and distinct perception</em> and then on to the first principles of metaphysics. Whereas there is evidence on both sides of the argument, the present essay will focus specifically on the metaphysics of God.</p>2024-05-20T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 THOIBISANA AKOIJAMhttps://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/3772The Queerness of Art and the Foucauldian Origins of Judith Butler's Notion of Performativity 2023-03-14T05:33:31+00:00Muhammed Shafi S. mhdshaffy@gmail.com<p>By deploying the methodology of Judith Butler's notion of Performativity, this article intends to understand the possibility of the concept of 'Queerness' beyond the possibilities of gender studies and queer theory and to develop a concept transcending the limits of identity. It is undeniable that Foucault's concept of disciplinarity is one of the major precursors of the notion of Performativity, which is a much more focused tool for what Foucault broadly devised. Both thinkers explain how a subject is a construction by power. They explain how bodies are marked, assigned, and manipulated and expose the banality with which these operations take one for granted. It is through unearthing the disciplinary aspects of Performativity in Butler and foreseeing the performative aspects of disciplinarity in Foucault that this article finds its methodological perspective. It is undeniable that disciplinarity and, as its extension, Performativity ultimately exposes the underlying ontology of identity as a 'truth effect' rather than an apriori truth. The paper critically analyses the artist's identity and the art discourse to expose the Queerness or underlying plurality of aesthetic experience using Performativity as a formative tool.</p>2024-05-20T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammed Shafi S. https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/3995Queer Politics in Hindu Mythology: Locating Misrepresentation of Gender Fluidity in Amar Chitra Katha’s "Krishna" and other Titles2023-02-28T04:44:01+00:00Sreyoshi Dhardhar.sreyoshi@gmail.comMoushumi Kandalimoushumi.kandali@gmail.com<p>In India, the Vedas and other Hindu mythologies mention of third-gendered gods and even some that manifest all the three genders, along with mentions of gods that cross-dress, without any gender transition. One such multi-faceted character in Hindu mythology is the character of Krishna. While commentaries on Krishna by brahmin scholars portray him as a masculine warrior, the non-brahmin commentaries such as <em>Shrimad Bhagavatam, </em>see Krishna in feminine terms. Krishna in such commentaries is seen as a cross-dressing, gender fluid being who is immensely comfortable in both his masculine and feminine identities, and adheres to both and none simultaneously. However, most retellings and adaptations of Krishna’s lore depict him as alluding to the former masculinist identity, thus completely subduing and ignoring the queer aspects of his character. Such focused partial exposure, unfortunately, begins at a very young age through the works of children’s literature. One such very influential franchise in India is the <em>Amar Chitra Katha. </em>In this paper, I would attempt to analyze the titles of <em>Krishna- Retold from the Bhagawat Puran </em>and <em>Bhagawat- The Krishna Avatar </em>thoroughly and explore how every aspect of it is changed or omitted in order to provide a heteronormative and heterosexual narrative.</p> <p> </p>2024-05-20T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Sreyoshi Dhar, Moushumi Kandalihttps://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/4003Referring to Moral Terms:2023-01-23T18:15:28+00:00Hossein Khodadadikhodadah@myumanitoba.ca<p class="Abstract">The project of realist moral naturalism is desirable for many philosophers. Proponents of realist moral naturalism believe that ordinary commonsense assumptions about moral claims are cognitively truth-apt. Realist moral naturalism, in this context, is shown to have developed through the works of Moore, Kripke, Putnam, Boyd, Horgans, and Timmons. Some raised objections and some sought solutions to justify the theory. In this paper, the author argues that the current formulation of Horgan and Timmons’s argument cannot rule out the application of causal semantic theory to moral terms. In addition, the author illustrates that Boyd’s project works well, and the causal semantic theory is applicable to moral terms.</p>2024-05-20T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Hossein Khodadadihttps://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/4408Life and Philosphy of Kṛṣṇa Dvaipāyan Vyāsa: The Chronicler of the Mahãbhãrata2024-02-08T08:22:02+00:00Joyati Bhattacharyajoyati09@gmail.com<p>Kṛṣṇa Dvaipāyan Vyāsa, popularly known as Veda Vyasa, is regarded to be the greatest seer of ancient India. He was an erudite scholar. He is credited with writing the epic <em>Mahābhārata</em> and dividing the Veda into four texts. Unlike other texts, Krsna Dvaipāyana Vyāsa also features as an important character in the <em>Mahābhārata</em>. He is believed to be the grandfather of the main protagonists of the epic. His character in the <em>Mahābhārata</em> shows that he is supremely wise. Vyāsa lived around the 3rd millennium BCE. There are references in the epic and the <em>Purānas</em> to the fact that Vyāsa lived at the close of the <em>DvāparaYug</em> (era). The festival of <em>Guru Purnima</em> is dedicated to him. Indian mythology says that ‘Vyāsa’ is not a particular person's name. It is the name given to a compiler. It is thus evident that there were compilers of the Veda who preceded Kṛṣṇa Dvaipāyana Vyāsa. However, as mythical as it may be, the chronicler of the <em>Mahābhārata</em> is the twenty-eighth Veda Vyāsa to be succeeded by Droni<em> (Ashwathāma</em>) in the forthcoming <em>Dvāpara Yug</em>. In the <em>Mahābhārata</em>, Vyāsa was worshipped as an incarnation of Brahmà, Narayana Vishnu and Maheshwara. Thus, the life of this great saint of ancient India is mired in many myths and realities, some of which are difficult to retrieve from the hold of time. The present study is an attempt to discern myth from reality and to draw a comprehensive sketch of the life and philosophy of the mystic based on the epic <em>Mahābhārata</em>.</p>2024-05-20T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Joyati Bhattacharya