Tattva Journal of Philosophy https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva <p>Tattva Journal of Philosophy seeks to facilitate critical study and in-depth reflection and analysis of issues, problems and concerns of human life, in order to further the directions and transformations human society needs to evolve into. It targets philosophers, educational institutions, research centres, social scientists, policymakers and any individual interested in and committed to human welfare.</p> <p>Tattva Journal of Philosophy is a <a href="https://ugccare.unipune.ac.in/Apps1/User/WebA/DesciplinewiseList?DiscpID=1&amp;DiscpName=Arts%20and%20Humanities">UGC-CARE Listed Journal</a>. (<strong>Group I, Arts and Humanities</strong>)</p> <p><strong>Open Access Policy</strong>: This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the <a href="https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/">Budapest Open Access Initiative</a> (BOAI) definition of open access.</p> <p><strong>Peer Review Policy:</strong> <em>Tattva</em> Journal of Philosophy is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal.</p> <p><strong>Publication Charges Policy</strong>: <em>Tattva</em> Journal of Philosophy <em>does not levy any charges from the authors or from authors' institutions or from any funding agency for the publication of the articles. This includes article processing charges (APCs), submission charges, page charges, colour charges or any instance where money is required to complete the publication process. Tattva</em>Journal of Philosophy <em>is fully funded by CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India. </em></p> CHRIST (Deemed to be University) en-US Tattva Journal of Philosophy 0975-332X <p>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:</p> <p>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a&nbsp;<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_new">Creative Commons Attribution License</a> that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</p> <p>Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.</p> <p>&nbsp;Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See&nbsp;<a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_new">The Effect of Open Access</a>).</p> Editorial https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/5051 Peter Jonkers Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Jonkers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2023-11-20 2023-11-20 15 2 v vii 10.12726/tjp.30.0 Modernity and Disenchantment: Charles Taylor on the Identity of the Modern Self https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/4066 <p>In his magnum opus, <em>Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity</em> (1989), Charles Taylor gives an exhaustive and teleologically interpretive history of the modern self. He, in fact, is in search of the core of the modern identity. By ‘identity’ Taylor means the ensemble of the understanding of what <em>is</em> to be a ‘human agent’, a ‘person’, a ‘self’. Taylor in generating the ontology of the self is greatly inspired by the understanding of <em>Dasein</em> in Heidegger. This paper also focuses on how Taylor uses Heidegger’s hermeneutics of the self in several ways to give to modernity a base that is not Cartesian. Taylor’s central argument is ‘how the assertion of the modern individual has spawned an erroneous understanding (identity) of the self’, where one experiences a loss of horizon. He has turned our attention, more than anyone else, towards the communitarian constitution of the self, and pointed out the limitations of insights within liberal individualism. For Taylor, as for early Heidegger, the self is not neutral or atomic. The self exists only in terms of questions and constitutive concerns, and it is not amenable to arbitrary determination, but can be made sense of only in terms of its life as a whole at any moment.</p> Anoop George Shareef K K Muhammed Copyright (c) 2023 ANOOP GEORGE, Shareef K K Muhammed https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2023-11-20 2023-11-20 15 2 1 19 10.12726/tjp.30.1 Metaphysical Realism and Naturalised Epistemology https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/2799 <p class="normal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11.0pt;">The paper aims to examine Michael Devitt’s arguments in favor of metaphysical realism where he argued that the issue of realism is devoid of the issues of semantics and epistemology. He has tried to compress his argument by focusing on the metaphysical or ontological questions of realism but he states that the epistemological concerns can be taken only when epistemology is naturalized. Devitt therefore has considered naturalized epistemology as a method to give potency to his Realism. Realism as defined by him is having majorly two characteristics, the independent dimension and the existence dimension that is, the view of the reality in which the reality exists independent of human mind. This independence and existence dimensions are not mutually exclusive. </span></p> Pragyanparamita Mohapatra Copyright (c) 2023 Pragyanparamita Mohapatra https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2023-11-20 2023-11-20 15 2 21 38 10.12726/tjp.30.2 The Arguments Favoring Epistemic Justification of Religious Belief: A Critique https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/2556 <p>In the epistemological trajectory of Philosophy of Religion, contemporary religious epistemologists seem to have undertaken the task of attestation of religious beliefs, their defence, ascertainment and justification, resorting to sanctioned methods of epistemic justification. The models of epistemic justification of religious beliefs they have adopted were intended to bring in a kind of objectivity into religious realm and make meaningful assertions on shared experiences.&nbsp; The acclamation of such esteemed epistemic attempts should be viewed as&nbsp;&nbsp; feverish attempts made by religious epistemologists to subject religious beliefs to standard epistemic treatment. In this paper, three contemporary models of justification of religious beliefs by three outstanding religious epistemologists, namely, Alvin Plantinga whose theory of proper basicality and the warrant, the epistemological holism with the application of Lakatosian principle in Philosophy of Science by Nancey Murphy and the cumulative case evidentialism by Richard Swinburne are critically analyzed using the parameters of logical consistency, methodological acumen, norms of&nbsp; belief formation, the role of subjectivity, features of religious language and the hermeneutic dynamics.</p> Sijo Sebastian Cherukarayil Copyright (c) 2023 Sijo Sebastian Cherukarayil https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2023-11-20 2023-11-20 15 2 39 56 10.12726/tjp.30.3 Vaishnava Philosophy and the Poetic Aesthetics: An Analysis of Jayadeva’s Gitagovindam https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/3640 <p>Literature finds the best expression when literary aesthetics and philosophy run side by side. The former offers the external charm, while the latter inculcates the more profound implication with the aim of providing it with a superior stature and permanence. Jayadeva’s Gitagovindam, being a colossal work in the field of Vaishnava literature, does contain the brilliant juxtaposition of both. This article attempts to show how Jayadeva’s Gitagovindam, a colossal work in the field of Vaishnava literature, does contain the brilliant juxtaposition of both. On the one hand, like a typical lyrical poem, its melodic nature does have a soothing effect and on the other, the use of philosophy instils in it a greater depth and seriousness to uplift itself as a book of devotion and religious inspiration. Moreover, the importance of this Holy Scripture lies in the fact that it not only played a significant role in paving the way to form a new sect in the Vaishnava religion, known as ‘Gaudiya Vaishnavism’, but also showed the later Vaishnava lyricists the art of portraying in words the amorous love of Lord Krishna and Radha with compassion and tears.</p> Sayantan Thakur Copyright (c) 2023 SAYANTAN THAKUR https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2023-11-20 2023-11-20 15 2 57 76 10.12726/tjp.30.4 Interrogating Hick’s View of Religious Pluralism https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/3781 <p><em>A philosopher whose name has become almost synonymous with religious pluralism is John Hick. He justifies his position by borrowing insights and concepts from Immanuel Kant and Ludwig Wittgenstein. We argue that Kantian and Wittgensteinian frameworks are inadequate to explain and defend religious pluralism of the kind he advocates. We critically analyze the concepts of religious experience and religious language and then proceed to discuss Yoga school of Indian philosophy as a limiting case against his enterprise.&nbsp; </em></p> Kavita Chauhan Venusa Tinyi Copyright (c) 2023 KAVITA CHAUHAN, Venusa Tinyi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2023-11-20 2023-11-20 15 2 77 97 10.12726/tjp.30.5