Science, Nature and the Ethical Pursuit of Happiness: A Discussion


  • Meera Baindur Manipal University, Jaipur, India



Pursuit of Knowledge, Objectivity, Morality, Ethics of Science


Most philosophical engagements with science have been focused on the methods of science, epistemological concerns, nature of scientific methods or natural laws.  New disciplines such as Science Studies and History of science have emerged from these inquiries and address any concerns on the relationship of science to society and knowledge. In this essay, the attempt is to clarify how scientific thought is not excluded from the moral domain. While a scientific fact itself cannot be subjected to moral or aesthetic judgement, since it is only, the aims and objects of scientific research can be a concern for philosophical ethics. Particularly the development of applied sciences that are focused on the exploitation of the natural world and unsustainable practices must become not only subject to moral supervision but also must be answerable to society and humanitarian interests. An analysis of the purpose of science and philosophy posits what should be the areas of science that should be subject to ethical judgements.


Merchant, C. (2005). Radical ecology. Routledge.

Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people: social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sarukkai, S. (2012). What is Science? National Book Trust: India.




How to Cite

Baindur, M. . (2021). Science, Nature and the Ethical Pursuit of Happiness: A Discussion . Tattva Journal of Philosophy, 12(2), 47-57.