Kant on Radical Evil: A Pragmatic Reading

Authors

  • Anthony Rimai Modern College, Imphal East, Manipur

Keywords:

Radical Evil, Propensity, Predisposition

Abstract

One of the primary concerns of Immanuel Kant in his major works on philosophy of religion is the doctrine of radical evil. He was greatly perplexed by the conundrums of this doctrine. Although Kant claimed it to be a universal trait, he failed to give a formal proof (evidence) supporting it. However, he asserted that the conducts of human beings are enough to demonstrate the nature of radical evil. The complexity of the doctrine is further fuelled by introducing the idea of the need of divine intervention for one to overcome such moral-religious predicament. Critical responses from both Christian and secular scholars reflect interesting take on his ethico-religious discourse.

One of the prominent criticisms to Kant’s doctrine of radical evil is its relapse to religious absurdity reflecting the Christian doctrine of the ‘fall of mankind’ as narrated in the first book of the Bible. Consequently, the seriousness of the criticism not only affects the moral maxims but also the portrayal of its strong religious affinity, rendering the doctrine even more allusive and perplexing. The article intends to throw some light on the pragmatic perspective of the doctrine with special focus on the universality of the radical evil nature of human.

Author Biography

Anthony Rimai, Modern College, Imphal East, Manipur

Modern College, Imphal East, Manipur.

References

Bernstein, R. J. (2002). REFLECTIONS ON RADICAL EVIL: Arendt and Kant. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 85, No. 1/2 (Spring/Summer 2002), 17-30. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41179024

Evil. (n.d.). In Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary online dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/evil_2

Formosa, P. (2007). Kant on the radical evil of human nature. The Philosophical Forum, 38: 221–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9191.2007.00265.x

Grimm, S. R. (2002). Kant’s Argument for Radical Evil. European Journal of Philosophy, 10: 160–177; https://doi.or/10.1111/1468-0378.00154

Kant, I. (2001). Religion and Rational Theology. (Allen Wood and George Di Giovanni, Trans.) NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (2009). Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. (Werner S. Pluhar, Trans.) Indianapolis, USA: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

Kant, I. (1998). Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and other Writings. (Allen Wood and George DI Giovanni, Trans.) Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (2006). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. (Robert B. Louden, Trans. & Ed.) New York, United States of America: Cambridge University Press.

Morgan, S. (2005). The Missing Formal Proof of Humanity’s Radical Evil in Kant’s Religion. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 114, No. 1 (Jan.), 63-114. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/30043651

Michalson, G. (1990). Fallen Freedom: Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration. NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Pasternack, L. R. (2014). Kant on Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: An interpretation and defense. NY, New York: Routledge Francis and Taylor group.

Quinn, P. (1988). In Adam’s Fall, We Sinned All. Philosophical Topics, Vol. 16, No. 2, Philosophy of Religion (FALL 1988), 89-118. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43154029

Wood, A. (1999). Kant’s Ethical Thought. NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2021-08-10

How to Cite

Rimai, A. (2021). Kant on Radical Evil: A Pragmatic Reading. Tattva Journal of Philosophy, 13(1). Retrieved from https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/2965