Kant and Heidegger on the freedom that eludes ‘the political’
Keywords:
political community, freedom, transcendentalism, authenticity, Kantian ethicsAbstract
By considering the transcendentalism of Kant and Heidegger as primarily oriented towards the concerns of practical philosophy, this paper explores some of the similarities in their notions of political community and their relation to freedom. It argues that, despite the differences in their philosophical registers, these similarities lead both of them to hold that ‘the political’ is a deficient mode of community. Certain transcendence of experience allows them both to change how a human being relates to another. Heidegger follows Kant’s lead in separating the concern of freedom from goodness and distances it even further from the means-ends reasoning by exiting the subject-object paradigm. The alternatives to the deficient political community, the kingdom of ends in Kant and the authentic community in Heidegger, too have potentially comparable facets. The paper concludes that their arguments leave an account of freedom that ‘must’ remain elusive for political action.
References
Arendt, H. (1982). Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy (R. Beiner, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1990). Philosophy and politics. Social research, 57(1), 73–103.
Beiner, R. (2001). Rereading Hannah Arendt’s Kant lectures. In R. Beiner & J. Nedelsky (Eds.), Judgment, imagination and politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt (pp. 91–102). Rowman & Littlefield.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). The political ontology of Martin Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
Dallmayr, F. R. (1980). Heidegger on intersubjectivity. Human studies, 3(3), 221–246. JSTOR.
Dallmayr, F. R. (1984). Ontology of freedom: Heidegger and political philosophy. Political theory, 12(2), 204–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/009
De Beistegui, M. (2002). Heidegger and the political (1st ed.). Taylor and Francis.
Dostal, R. J. (2001). Judging human action: Arendt’s appropriation of Kant. In R. Beiner & J. Nedelsky (Eds.), Judgment, imagination and politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt (pp. 139–164). Rowman & Littlefield.
Duff, A. S. (2015). Heidegger and politics: The ontology of radical discontent. Cambridge University Press.
Dungey, N. (2001). (Re)Turning Derrida to Heidegger: Being-with-others as primordial politics. Polity, 33(3), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/32 3544
Flikschuh, K. (2002). Kantian desires: Freedom of choice and action in Rechtslehre. In M. Timmons (Ed.), Kant’s metaphysics of morals: Interpretative essays (pp. 185–208). Oxford University Press.
Furner, J. (2019). Can Kant’s Formula of the End in Itself condemn capitalism? Kantian review, 24(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136941 541800050X
Guyer, P. (2003). Kant on the theory and practice of autonomy. Social Philosophy and Policy, 20(2), 70–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052503 20203X
Guyer, P. (2011). Kantian Communities: The realm of ends, the ethical community, and the highest good. In C. Payne & L. Thorpe (Eds.), Kant and the concept of community (pp. 17–41). Boydell and Brewer.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Hölderlin’s hymn “The Ister.” Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1997). Kant and the problem of metaphysics (5th ed. Enl.). Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2002). The essence of human freedom: An introduction to philosophy (T. Sadler, Trans.). Continuum.
Heidegger, M. (2007). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Blackwell publishing.
Kant, I. (1929). Critique of Pure Reason (N. K. Smith, Trans.). Macmillan.
Kant, I. (1991). Political writings (H. S. Reiss, Ed.; 2nd, enl. ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2006). Toward perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. In P. Kleingeld (Ed.) & D. L. Colclasure (Trans.), Towards perpetual peace and other writings on politics, peace and history (pp. 67–109). Yale University Press.
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). Creating the kingdom of ends. Cambridge University Press.
Macmillan.Kant, I. (2006). Toward perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. In P. Kleingeld (Ed.), & D. L. Colclasure (Trans.), Towards perpetual peace and other writings on politics, peace and history (pp. 67–109). Yale University Press.
Nelson, E. S. (2016). Heidegger’s failure to overcome transcendental philosophy. In H. Kim & S. Hoeltzel (Eds.), Transcendental Inquiry (pp. 159–179). Palgrave Macmillan.
Newell, W. R. (1984). Heidegger on freedom and community: Some political implications of his early thought. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 775–784. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961843
Ricœur, P. (1987). The teleological and deontological structures of action: Aristotle and/or Kant? Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture series, 21, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0957042X00003503
Schalow, F. (2013). Heidegger and Kant: Three guiding questions. In F. Raffoul & E. S. Nelson (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger (pp. 105-118). Bloomsbury Academic.
Schürman, R. (1978). Political thinking in Heidegger. Social research, 45(1), 191–221.
Steiner, G. (1978). Martin Heidegger. University of Chicago Press.
Strawson, P. F. (1966). The bounds of sense: An essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Harper & Row.
Thorpe, L. (2011). Kant on the relationship between autonomy and community. In L. Thorpe & C. Payne (Eds.), Kant and the concept of community (pp. 41-59) . Rochester University Press.
Velkley, R. (2006). Freedom from the good: Heidegger’s idealist grounding of politics. In S. Rosen & N. Ranasinghe (Eds.), Logos and eros: Essays honoring Stanley Rosen (pp. 187-203). St. Augustine’s Press.
White, S. K. (1990). Heidegger and the difficulties of a postmodern ethics and politics. Political Theory, 18(1), 80–103.
Wood, A. W. (1991). Unsociable sociability: The anthropological basis of Kantian ethics. Philosophical Topics, 19(1), 325–351.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nithin Jacob Thomas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
