Metaphysics of Communication
Keywords:
intent, communication, metaphysics, Sphota, Wittgenstein, BhartrihariAbstract
The Metaphysics of Communication explores the foundational principles of communication that extend beyond the transmission of information, delving into the nature, intention, and ontological significance of linguistic interactions. This paper presents a comparative analysis of various philosophical traditions, including Western thinkers such as Ludwig Wittgenstein, alongside Indian philosophical perspectives like Bhartrihari’s Sphoṭa theory and the Nyaya concept of śabda-pramāṇa. Central to this investigation is the question of whether language inherently communicates intention or functions through an underlying mechanism rooted in shared cultural practices and contexts. Wittgenstein’s notion of forms of life suggests that language gains meaning from its use within communal activities, where shared practices enable understanding. However, this shared understanding remains fluid, resisting confinement within fixed frameworks of reference. This insight challenges the assumption that intention is a stable and fully transmittable entity. In contrast, Bhartrhari’s Sphoṭa theory posits an indivisible unity of sound and meaning, emphasizing an intuitive grasp of the speaker’s intention. By juxtaposing these perspectives, the analysis examines the ontological and epistemological dimensions of communication, highlighting how diverse intellectual traditions address the questions of intention, meaning, and the limitations of linguistic representation. This study ultimately argues that communication is not merely a mechanical transfer of ideas but a dynamic interplay of intention, context, and shared existence, revealing the profound connection between language and human experience.
References
References
Books:
• Pillai, K. Raghavan. 1971. Vakyapadiya. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
• Prinz, Jesse. 2002. Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Shapiro, Lawrence. 2004. The Mind Incarnate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Tiwari, Devendra Nath. 2014. Language, Being, and Cognition: Philosophy of Language and Analysis: Contemporary Perspective. Guwahati: Astha Publications.
• ———. 2008. The Central Problems of Bharthari's Philosophy. New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
• ———. 2021. Dynamics of the Language: Philosophy of the World of Words. Delhi: D.K. Printworld Pvt. Ltd.
• Panini. Paninišikşa, edited and translated by Damodar Mahato. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2010.
• Patañjali. Mahābhāşya, critical edition with English translation. Fascicule I to VIII. Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1985–1992.
Journal Articles:
• Andersen, Peter E. 1991. "When One Cannot Not Communicate: A Challenge to Motley's Traditional Communication Postulates." Taylor & Francis 42 (4): 309–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979109368346.
• Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. "Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage."
• Carassa, Antonella, and Marco Colombetti. 2009. "Joint Meaning." Elsevier BV 41 (9): 1837–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.03.005.
• Chen, Zhian, and Yuan Yuan-quan. 2009. "Interpretation of Polite Utterances: A Perspective of Cognitive Semiotics." De Gruyter 1 (1): 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2009-0014.
• Chernikova, Irina V. 2014. "Cognition as a Subject of Research in Cognitive Science." Elsevier BV 154: 309–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.169.
• Chomsky, Noam. 2014. "Some Core Contested Concepts." Springer Science+Business Media 44 (1): 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9331-5.
• Conant, David F., Kristofer E. Bouchard, and Edward F. Chang. 2013. "Speech Map in the Human Ventral Sensory-Motor Cortex." Elsevier BV 24: 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.08.015.
• Duranti, Alessandro. 2006. "The Social Ontology of Intentions." SAGE Publishing 8 (1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059548.
• Eldesoky, Ahmad Mohammed, Ebrahim, and Ashraf Hassan Mohamed Hassan Ali Aldebsi. 2023. "Context and Its Role in Explaining the Significance of Structure." 13 (6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i6/17404.
• Fox, Craig R. 2010. "Wittgenstein on Meaning and Meaning-Blindness." 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/upo9781844654420.003.
• Gauker, Christopher. 1992. "The Lockean Theory of Communication." Wiley 26 (3): 303–03. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215956.
• Gleitman, Lila R., and Anna Papafragou. 2013. "Relations Between Language and Thought." Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.013.0032.
• Glendinning, Simon. 2000. "Communication and Writing: A Public Language Argument." Oxford University Press 100 (1): 271–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-7372.2003.00016.x.
• Gregg, Richard B. 1987. "Communication Epistemology: A Study in the 'Language' of Cognition." Routledge 73 (2): 232–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638709383805.
• Gustafson, Donald. 1984. "Wittgenstein and a Causal View of Intentional Action." Wiley 7 (3): 225–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.1984.tb00047.x.
• Guthrie, Douglas. 1940. "The Pathology of Speech and Voice." National Institutes of Health 47 (6): 391–405.
• Komlev, N. G. 1980. "A Linguistic Interpretation of Thought in Relation to Speech." Taylor & Francis 19 (2): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-040519023.
• Kumar, ShashiPrabha. 2019. "Śabda in Vaiśeṣika." Springer Nature: 105–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2965-4_8.
• Lakoff, George. 1993. "The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor." Cambridge University Press: 202–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139173865.013.
• Lu, Deping. 2019. "Peirce’s Philosophy of Communication and Language Communication." De Gruyter 2019 (230): 407–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0164.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shivendra Vikram Singh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).