Metaphysics of Communication

Authors

  • Shivendra Vikram Singh Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Keywords:

intent, communication, metaphysics, Sphota, Wittgenstein, Bhartrihari

Abstract

The Metaphysics of Communication explores the foundational principles of communication that extend beyond the transmission of information, delving into the nature, intention, and ontological significance of linguistic interactions. This paper presents a comparative analysis of various philosophical traditions, including Western thinkers such as Ludwig Wittgenstein, alongside Indian philosophical perspectives like Bhartrihari’s Sphoṭa theory and the Nyaya concept of śabda-pramāṇa. Central to this investigation is the question of whether language inherently communicates intention or functions through an underlying mechanism rooted in shared cultural practices and contexts. Wittgenstein’s notion of forms of life suggests that language gains meaning from its use within communal activities, where shared practices enable understanding. However, this shared understanding remains fluid, resisting confinement within fixed frameworks of reference. This insight challenges the assumption that intention is a stable and fully transmittable entity. In contrast, Bhartrhari’s Sphoṭa theory posits an indivisible unity of sound and meaning, emphasizing an intuitive grasp of the speaker’s intention. By juxtaposing these perspectives, the analysis examines the ontological and epistemological dimensions of communication, highlighting how diverse intellectual traditions address the questions of intention, meaning, and the limitations of linguistic representation. This study ultimately argues that communication is not merely a mechanical transfer of ideas but a dynamic interplay of intention, context, and shared existence, revealing the profound connection between language and human experience.

References

References

Books:

• Pillai, K. Raghavan. 1971. Vakyapadiya. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

• Prinz, Jesse. 2002. Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

• Shapiro, Lawrence. 2004. The Mind Incarnate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

• Tiwari, Devendra Nath. 2014. Language, Being, and Cognition: Philosophy of Language and Analysis: Contemporary Perspective. Guwahati: Astha Publications.

• ———. 2008. The Central Problems of Bharthari's Philosophy. New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research.

• ———. 2021. Dynamics of the Language: Philosophy of the World of Words. Delhi: D.K. Printworld Pvt. Ltd.

• Panini. Paninišikşa, edited and translated by Damodar Mahato. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2010.

• Patañjali. Mahābhāşya, critical edition with English translation. Fascicule I to VIII. Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1985–1992.

Journal Articles:

• Andersen, Peter E. 1991. "When One Cannot Not Communicate: A Challenge to Motley's Traditional Communication Postulates." Taylor & Francis 42 (4): 309–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979109368346.

• Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. "Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage."

• Carassa, Antonella, and Marco Colombetti. 2009. "Joint Meaning." Elsevier BV 41 (9): 1837–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.03.005.

• Chen, Zhian, and Yuan Yuan-quan. 2009. "Interpretation of Polite Utterances: A Perspective of Cognitive Semiotics." De Gruyter 1 (1): 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2009-0014.

• Chernikova, Irina V. 2014. "Cognition as a Subject of Research in Cognitive Science." Elsevier BV 154: 309–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.169.

• Chomsky, Noam. 2014. "Some Core Contested Concepts." Springer Science+Business Media 44 (1): 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9331-5.

• Conant, David F., Kristofer E. Bouchard, and Edward F. Chang. 2013. "Speech Map in the Human Ventral Sensory-Motor Cortex." Elsevier BV 24: 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.08.015.

• Duranti, Alessandro. 2006. "The Social Ontology of Intentions." SAGE Publishing 8 (1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059548.

• Eldesoky, Ahmad Mohammed, Ebrahim, and Ashraf Hassan Mohamed Hassan Ali Aldebsi. 2023. "Context and Its Role in Explaining the Significance of Structure." 13 (6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i6/17404.

• Fox, Craig R. 2010. "Wittgenstein on Meaning and Meaning-Blindness." 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/upo9781844654420.003.

• Gauker, Christopher. 1992. "The Lockean Theory of Communication." Wiley 26 (3): 303–03. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215956.

• Gleitman, Lila R., and Anna Papafragou. 2013. "Relations Between Language and Thought." Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.013.0032.

• Glendinning, Simon. 2000. "Communication and Writing: A Public Language Argument." Oxford University Press 100 (1): 271–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-7372.2003.00016.x.

• Gregg, Richard B. 1987. "Communication Epistemology: A Study in the 'Language' of Cognition." Routledge 73 (2): 232–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638709383805.

• Gustafson, Donald. 1984. "Wittgenstein and a Causal View of Intentional Action." Wiley 7 (3): 225–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.1984.tb00047.x.

• Guthrie, Douglas. 1940. "The Pathology of Speech and Voice." National Institutes of Health 47 (6): 391–405.

• Komlev, N. G. 1980. "A Linguistic Interpretation of Thought in Relation to Speech." Taylor & Francis 19 (2): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-040519023.

• Kumar, ShashiPrabha. 2019. "Śabda in Vaiśeṣika." Springer Nature: 105–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2965-4_8.

• Lakoff, George. 1993. "The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor." Cambridge University Press: 202–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139173865.013.

• Lu, Deping. 2019. "Peirce’s Philosophy of Communication and Language Communication." De Gruyter 2019 (230): 407–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0164.

Published

2025-11-18

How to Cite

Vikram Singh, S. (2025). Metaphysics of Communication. Tattva Journal of Philosophy, 17(2), 63 - 77. Retrieved from https://journals.christuniversity.in/index.php/tattva/article/view/6400