Visishtādvaita and Wahdatul-Wujūd: Points of comparison and departure


  • Zaheer Ali Khan Sharvani Sri Venkateswara University
  • S Abdul Sattar, Ph D Sri Venkateswara University



Not only in philosophy but in religion as well, concepts such as God, World and Man are discussed quite considerably. Nevertheless, an understanding of these concepts requires careful, detailed and systematic analyses. One of the methods of achieving the same is to use a comparative framework. Within Islam, Wahdatul-Wujud (Unity of Existence) is an important mystical and philosophical perspective that has witnessed a tumultuous journey. It has however played a dominant role in Islamic thought. Within Indian philosophy, Vedānta has played a very influential role. Visistādvaita as a school of thought has also played a great role to interpret core philosophical concepts of Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita and Brahma Sutras. In this research paper, we attempt to provide a comparative analysis of Visistādvaita and Wahdatul-Wujud marking out the aspects of similarity and departures. What stands out as relevant and insightful as an implication of the comparative method is an understanding of these two approaches. Wahdatul-Wujud is redefined as a panentheistic philosophy which believes that God exists inside of everything, but is at the same time, transcendent of everything. In this type ofbelief, God is seen as an eternal spark of all things, the Prime Mover. Quite similarly, Visistādvaita, on the other hand is conceived as a Qualified Non- dualistic philosophy which believes in subsuming every diverse phenomena and experience under an underlying unity.

Author Biographies

Zaheer Ali Khan Sharvani, Sri Venkateswara University

Research Scholar, Department of Philosophy, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India

S Abdul Sattar, Ph D, Sri Venkateswara University

Head, Department of Philosophy, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India




How to Cite

Sharvani, Z. A. K., & Abdul Sattar, S. (2016). Visishtādvaita and Wahdatul-Wujūd: Points of comparison and departure. Tattva Journal of Philosophy, 8(1), 1-18.