Regulating Related Party Transactions During the COVID-19 Crisis

Authors

  • Anna Toniolo University of Trento, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.18.1

Keywords:

Controllers, Corporate Governance, Economic crisis, Minority Shareholders, Liquidity Lifeline

Abstract

Related party transactions ("RPTs") are frequently used as a tool for siphoning off value from a company, but they can also be an efficient instrument for assisting firms. The trade-off between stopping value-decreasing RPTs and promoting value-increasing RPTs requires lawmakers to seek an optimal balance, relying on several contingent factors. This paper highlights the strong interdependency between RPTs regulation and economic changes. After the 2008 crisis, policymakers have enhanced minority shareholders' control over RPTs, considering their involvement as the most effective safeguard against tunnelling. During the COVID-19 crisis, governments have introduced exemptions to the rules on RPTs, even if they might weaken minority shareholders' protection. The reason is that firms face dramatic liquidity shortfalls due to the pandemic, and RPTs can be a vehicle for providing finance to distressed companies, avoiding a wave of bankruptcies that would be dangerous for the economy. Thus, RPTs regulation has been tweaked for adapting to the new economic environment, and these legal changes, in turn, could affect the economic recovery.

Author Biography

Anna Toniolo, University of Trento, Italy

Post Doc Research Fellow at University of Trento, Italy

References

International Accounting Standards Board, International Accounting Standard No. 24.

L. Enriques, Related Party Transactions: Policy Options and Real-World Challenges (With a Critique of the European Commission Proposal), EURPOEAN BUSINESS ORGANISATION LAW REVIEW 1 2 (2015).

R. La Porta et al., The law and economics of self-dealing, JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS 88(3) (2008).

A. Habib et al., Related Party Transactions and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence From China, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING (2019).

Related Party Transactions and Audit Fees: Evidence from China, 14, JOURNAL OF INTRERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH (2015).

Y. L Cheung et al., Buy high, sell low: How listed firms price asset transfers in related party transactions, 33(5), JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, Elsevier, 914(2009).

A. M. PACCES, RETHINKING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF CONTROL POWERS, Routledge Research in Corporate Law,1, 233-234 (2012).

World Bank, Protecting Minority Shareholders: Frequently Asked Questions, (May 2019), https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploretopics/protecting-minority-investors/faq.

E. A. Gordon et al., Related Party Transactions: Associations with Corporate Governance and Firm Value, EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings Paper No. 4377, AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper (2004).

S. Johnson et al., Tunneling, 90 AM. ECON. REV. 22, 22 (2000).

A. Atanasov et al., Law And Tunneling, 37 JOURNAL OF CORPORATION LAW, 1 (2011).

Unbundling and Measuring Tunneling, U. ILL. L. REV. 101 (2014).

S. Djankov et al., The law and economics of self-dealing, 88 JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 430-465 (2008).

M. J. Barclay & C. G. Holderness, Private Benefits of Control in Public Corporations, 25 JJFE 371, 374 (1989).

OECD, Related Party Transactions and Minority Shareholder Rights, OECD Publishing (2012).

Z. Goshen & A. Hamdani, Corporate Control and the Regulation of Controlling Shareholder 24, THE LAW AND FINANCE OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger eds., (2019).

J. R. Franks & C. Mayer, Evolution of Ownership and Control Around the World: The Changing Face of Capitalism, 33 Working Paper (2017).

S. Y. Kang, Optimally Restrained Tunneling: The Puzzle of Controlling Shareholders’ “Generous” Exploitation in Bad-Law Jurisdictions, in THE LAW AND FINANCE OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 287 (L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger eds., 2019).

A. M. Pacces, Procedural and Substantive Review of Related Party Transactions. The Case for Noncontrolling Shareholder-Dependent Directors, THE LAW AND FINANCE OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 182 (L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger eds., 2019).

L. Enriques et al., RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, THE ANATOMY OF CORPORATE LAW: A COMPARATIVE AND FUNCTIONAL APPROACH 146 (R. Kraakman et al. eds., 2017).

J. Damman, Related Party Transactions and Intragroup Transactions, THE LAW AND FINANCE OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 218 (L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger eds., 2019).

K. J. Hopt, Groups of Companies. A Comparative Study on the Economics, Law and Regulation of Corporate Groups, ECGI (2015).

T. H. Tröger, Corporate Groups, A German’s European Perspective, SAFE WORKING PAPER NO. 66 (2014).

P.-H. Conac, Director’s Duties in Groups of Companies – Legalizing the Interest of the Group at the European Level, ECFR (2013).

D. H. Downs et al., Related Party Transactions and Firm Value: Evidence from Property Markets in Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore, 52 J. REAL ESTATE FINAN. ECON. 408 (2016).

R. M. K. Wong et al., Are Related-Party Sales Value-Adding or Value-Destroying? Evidence from China, 26 J. INT’L FINAN. MGMT. & ACCT. 1 (2015).

M. Ryngaert & S. Thomas, Not All Related Party Transactions (RPTs) Are the Same: Ex-ante Versus Ex-post RPTs, 50 J. ACCT. RES. 845 (2012).

K. S. Kim, Related Party Transactions in East Asia, THE LAW AND FINANCE OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 287 (L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger eds., 2019).

R. H. Coase, The nature of the firm, 4 ECONOMETRICA N. S. 386-4040 (1937).

R. W. Masulis et al., Family Business Groups around the World: Financing Advantages, Control Motivations, and Organizational Choices, 24 REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 3556 (2011).

E. Friedman et al., Propping and Tunneling, 31 J. COMP. ECON., 4, 732 (2003); M. Jian & T.J. Wong, Propping through Related Party Transactions, REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 70–105 (2010).

Y.L. Cheung et al., Tunneling, Propping, and Expropriation: Evidence from Connected Party Transactions in Hong Kong, 82 J. FIN. ECON, 343 (2006).

L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger, The Law and (Some) Finance of Related Party Transactions. An Introduction, THE LAW AND FINANCE OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 5-6 (L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger eds., 2019).

C. J. Milhaupt & M. Pargendler, Related Party Transactions in State-Owned Enterprises. Tunneling, Propping, and Policy Channeling, THE LAW AND FINANCE OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 248 (L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger eds., 2019).

Y. L. Cheung et al., Buy high, sell low: How listed firms price asset transfers in related party transactions, JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE (2009).

Z. Goshen, The Efficiency of Controlling Corporate Self-Dealing: Theory Meets Reality, 91 CALIF. L. REV. 393, 402(2003).

Weinberger v. UOP, 7, Corp. L. Rev. 195, 196 (1984).

Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc, Supreme Court of Delaware, 1994, 638 A.2d 1110.

Kahn v. M & F Worldwide Corp., in 88 A.3d 635 ss. (Del. 2014).

“Parmalat Case”: Trib. Parma, 29 marzo 2013 (decr.), Giur. comm., 2014, II, pp. 95 ss. Trib. Parma, 11 novembre 2013 (decr.).

App. Bologna, 26 maggio 2014 (decr.), Giur. comm., 2015, II, pp. 1012 ss.

“Fondiaria-Sai Case”: Trib. Milano, 20 dicembre 2013 (ord.), nonché Trib. Milano, 20 febbraio 2015 (ord), www.giurisprudenzadelleimprese.it.

M. Pizzo, Related party transactions under a contingency perspective, 17 JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & GOVERNANCE No. 2, 319-320 (2013).

M. Lemmon, & K. V. Lins, Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian Financial Crisis, JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 58, 1445–1468 (2003).

M. Bertrand et al., Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 117(1), 121–148 (2002).

M. Kang, The Association between Related-Party Transactions and Control-Ownership Wedge: Evidence from Korea, 29 PACIFIC-BASIN FIN. J. 272 (2014).

D. W. Puchniak & U. Varottil, Related Party Transactions in Commonwealth Asia. Complexity Revealed, THE LAW AND FINANCE OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 343-344 (L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger eds., 2019).

Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs OECD Steering Group on Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance and the Financial Crisis. Conclusions and emerging good practices to enhance implementation of the Principles, OECD publishing (2010).

FINANCIAL CRISIS INQUIRY COMMISSION, FINAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE CAUSES OF THE FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS IN THE UNITED STATES, (2011).

J. De Larosière, Report of the High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU, (2009).

ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS, CLIMBING OUT OF THE CREDIT CRUNCH. ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS, LONDON, (2008). G.Kirkpatrick, Corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis, OECD PUBLISHING, (2009).

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, GREEN PAPER. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND REMUNERATION POLICIES, BRUSSELS, (2010).

J. De Larosière, Report of the High-Level Group on Financial Supervision EU, BRUSSELS (25 February 2009).

C. Van der Elst & E. P.M. Vermeulen, Europe’s Corporate Governance Green Paper: Rethinking Shareholder Engagement, THE EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MARKET IN TRANSITION, 200 (H. S. Birkmose et al. eds., 2012).

L. ENRIQUES ET AL., THE BASIC GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE: MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS AND NON-SHAREHOLDER CONSTITUENCIES, THE ANATOMY OF CORPORATE LAW. A COMPARATIVE AND FUNCTIONAL APPROACH 79 (R. Kraakman et al. eds., 2017).

In the U.S.: In Re Enron 235 F Supp. 2d 549 U.S (2002) and SEC v WorldCom Inc 273 F Supp 2d 431 (2003).

European Commission, Green Paper. The EU corporate governance framework, Brussels, 5.4.2011 COM(2011) 164 final.

A. Hamdani & Y.Yafeh, Institutional Investors As Minority Shareholders, THE LAW AND FINANCE OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 137 (L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger eds., 2019).

European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2007/36/EC as regards the encouragement of long-term shareholder engagement and Directive 2013/34/EU as regards certain elements of the corporate governance statement, Brussels, 9.4.2014 COM(2014), art. 9c(2).

C. Di Noia, European Company Law and Related Party Transactions. The EU legal framework, in CONVEGNO DI DIRITTO SOCIETARIO EUROPEO E OPERAZIONI CON PARTI CORRELATE, (2014); T. H. Tröger, Corporate groups: A German's European perspective, SAFE Working Paper, No. 66, Goethe University Frankfurt, SAFE, 29 (2014).

Business Europe and European Issuers, Business message on the upcoming committee vote on the shareholder rights proposal, 28 April 2015, https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2015-00342-E.pdf.

European Banking Federation, EBF comments on the Revision of the Shareholders’ Rights Directive, 23 September 2014, http://www.ebf-fbe.eu/position/ebf-comments-revision-shareholders-rights-directive-remuneration-related-party-transactions/.

Business Europe and European Issuers, Business message on the upcoming committee vote on the shareholder rights proposal, (2015), https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2015-00342-E.pdf.

T. H. Tröger, Corporate groups: A German's European perspective, (SAFE Working Paper, No. 66, Goethe University Frankfurt, SAFE,p. 33(2014); H. Fleischer, Related Party Transactions bei börsennotierten Gesellschaften: Deutsches Aktien(konzern)recht und Europäische Reformvorschläge, 45 Betriebs-Berater 2691, p. 2696, 2014).

T. H. Tröger, Corporate groups: A German's European perspective, (SAFE Working Paper, No. 66, Goethe University Frankfurt, SAFE, 2014p. 29, 2014).

T. Strand, Short-termism in the European Union, 22 COLUM. J. EUR. L., 15, 48 (2015-2016).

E. B. ROCK, INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, OXFORD HANDBOOK OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE(2018).

E. B. Rock, Majority of the Minority Approval in a World of Active Shareholders, THE LAW AND FINANCE OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 105 (L. Enriques & T. H. Tröger eds., (2019).

Interinstitutional File 2014/0121 (COD), the Presidency compromise text Brussels, November 10, 2014, 13758/14; the Presidency compromise text Brussels, December 5, 2014, 15647/14; the Presidency compromise text, Council of the European Union, January 14, 2015, 5215/15 [Presidential Compromise Proposal].

Interinstitutional File 2014/0121 (COD), Brussels, July 22, 2015, Outcome of the European Parliament's proceedings.

M. Roth, Related party transactions: board members and shareholders. The European Commission proposal and beyond, (2016), available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2710128.

P. Srinivasan, An Analysis of Related-Party Transactions in India, IIM Bangalore Research Paper No. 402 (2013).

M. Dhanush, Related Party Transactions Under the Companies Act, 2013 (2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2857182 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2857182.

§ 188(1), second proviso, The Companies Act 2013, Acts of Parliament, 2013 (India).

P. S. Velmurugan & I.VK Mohammad, An Analysis of Corporate Governance Issues Arising Out of Related-Party Transactions: With Special Reference to NSE 200 Companies (2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3095168 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3095168.

M. Bertrand et al., Ferreting Out Tunneling: An Application to Indian Business Groups, 117 Q.J. ECON. 121 (2002).

§ 16, The Companies (Amendment) Act 2015, No. 22, Acts of Parliament, 2019 (India).

U. Varottil, A Cautionary Tale of the Transplant Effect on Indian Corporate Governance, 21 Nat’l. L. Sch. Ind. Rev. 1, 30 (2009).

A. Kotoky, IndiGo’s billionaire owners’ feud over governance lapses heads to court, https://theprint.in/economy/indigos-owners-feud-over-heads-to-court/300006/.

A. Mandhani, All about related party transactions that are at the heart of IndiGo promoters’ spat, https://theprint.in/theprint-essential/all-about-related-party-transactions-that-are-at-the-heart-of-indigo-promoters-spat/266333/.

SEBI, Report of the Working Group on Related Party Transactions, (2020).

R. Romano, Regulating in the Dark, YALE LAW & ECONOMICS RESEARCH PAPER No. 442 (March 30, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1974148 or http:// dx.doi.org/ 10.2139/ ssrn.1974148 (2016).

C. Mason, The Coronavirus Economic Crisis: Its Impact on Venture Capital and High Growth Enterprises, Publications Office of the European Union (J. Gavigan ed., 2020).

J. Furman, Protecting people now, helping the economy rebound later, MITIGATING THE COVID ECONOMIC CRISIS: ACT FAST AND DO WHATEVER IT TAKES, CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (R. Baldwin & B. Weder di Mauro eds., 2020).

G. Gopinath, Limiting the economic fallout of the coronavirus with large targeted policies, in Mitigating the COVID Economic Crisis: Act Fast and Do Whatever It Takes, CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (R. Baldwin & B. Weder di Mauro eds., 2020).

W. L. Megginson & V. Fotak, Government Equity Investments in Coronavirus Bailouts: Why, How, When? (April 14, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3561282 or http:// dx.doi.org/ 10.2139/ ssrn.3561282.

International Monetary Fund, A Crisis Like No Other. An Uncertain Recovery, World Economic Outlook Update, (2020); Robin Wigglesworth, Coronavirus Creates Biggest Economic Uncertainty in Decades, Financial Times, April 20, 2020. Available at: .

OECD, National corporate governance related initiatives during the COVID-19 crisis, OECD Publishing (2020). H. Eidenmüller & K. van Zwieten, COVID-19 and Beyond: The Case for Creditor Cooperation Duties in Corporate Workouts, in COVID-19 and Business Law, Verlag C.H.Beck oHG, 67 (H. Eidenmüller et al. eds., 2020).

P. R. Lane, The monetary policy package: An analytical framework, in Mitigating the COVID Economic Crisis: Act Fast and Do Whatever It Takes, CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (R. Baldwin & B. Weder di Mauro eds., 2020).

C. Odendahl J. Springford, Bold policies needed to counter the coronavirus recession, in Mitigating the COVID Economic Crisis: Act Fast and Do Whatever It Takes, CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (R. Baldwin & B. Weder di Mauro eds., 2020).

Y. Huang et al., Saving China from the coronavirus and economic meltdown: Experiences and lessons, in Mitigating the COVID Economic Crisis: Act Fast and Do Whatever It Takes, CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (R. Baldwin & B. Weder di Mauro eds., 2020).

G. Gobbi et al., Unintended effects of loan guarantees during the COVID-19 crisis, VoxEU.org., April 15, 2020.

D. A. Zetzsche et al., The COVID-19-Crisis and Company Law - Towards Virtual Shareholder Meetings, UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG FACULTY OF LAW, ECONOMICS & FINANCE WPS 2020-007 (2020).

L. Enriques, Pandemic-Resistant Corporate Law: How to Help Companies Cope with Existential Threats and Extreme Uncertainty During the COVID-19 Crisis, EUROPEAN COMPANY AND FINANCIAL LAW REVIEW (Forthcoming), European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper No. 530/23020, (June 29, 2020).

FCA, Statement of Policy: listed companies and recapitalisation issuances during the coronavirus crisis, April 8, 2020.

T. Smith, Listed companies: FCA equity fundraising measures, Corporate and M&A, Corporate Advisory, April 14, 2020.

Securities and Exchange Commission, release no. 34-88572, file no. SR-NYSE-2020-30 (Apr. 6, 2020); Securities and Exchange Commission, release no. 34-88875, file no. SR-NYSE-2020-43 (May 14, 2020).

Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB), Resolution n. 21396 of 10 June 2020, Temporary suspension of the application of some provisions of the Regulation adopted with Resolution 17221/2010 and subsequent amendments on related party transactions (RPT) to facilitate the use of the exclusion option in cases of urgency by companies with shares listed on regulated markets and by companies with shares widely distributed among the public.

Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB), Press Release. COVID-19: Related party regulation, Consob simplifies the use of the exemption in the case of urgent capital strengthening operations, June 12, 2020.

Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB), Communication n. 6/2020 of 11 June 2020.

T. Custer, COVID-19 and the Bankruptcy Court Workload, 19 May 2020, https://blogs.harvard.edu/bankruptcyroundtable/2020/05/19/COVID-19-and-the-bankruptcy-court-workload/.

J. Galì, Helicopter money: The time is now, in Mitigating the COVID Economic Crisis: Act Fast and Do Whatever It Takes, CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (R. Baldwin & B. Weder di Mauro eds., 2020).

C. J. Milhaupt, & K. Pistor, Law and Capitalism: What Corporate Crises Reveal about Legal Systems and Economic Development around the World, THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, 219 (2008).

Y. Listokin, Law and Macroeconomics: The Law and Economics of Recessions, Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 576 (2016).

R. D. Cooter et al., The Importance of Law in Promoting Innovation and Growth, The Kauffman Task Force on Law, Innovation, and Growth, Rules for Growth. Promoting Innovation and Growth through Legal Reform (Kauffman Foundation, 2011).

Downloads

Published

2021-01-01

How to Cite

Toniolo, A. (2021). Regulating Related Party Transactions During the COVID-19 Crisis. Christ University Law Journal, 10(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.18.1