Marital Rape: An Evaluation of the Patriarchal Injustice in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.5.6Abstract
The traditional belief that marriage provides a husband with sole rights over his wife, thereby exempting him from any prosecution for raping his wife, has been the justification for denying a woman the right to consent to sexual intercourse in marriage. Unfortunately, this belief has been a source of subjugation and exploitation of women at the behest of their husbands. Despite recommendations to revoke it, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 has retained the marital exception. The purpose of this article is to examine this dichotomy in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 that punishes rape as such, but does not penalise a husband raping his wife of fifteen years or above. Employing doctrinal method of research, this article analyses the various discrepancies and ambiguities in the Act of 2013 that perpetuate this culture of oppression and violence. Consent is the antithesis to rape. Thus, having examined the need for a married woman’s right to consent, this note examines the ensuing lacunae that grant legal sanction to child marriages, create an unexplained discrepancy in the punishment for rape, and create variations in the age of consent and the age for availing exception. The recognition of marital rape when spouses live separately and not otherwise appears to be a mysterious distinction. Further, treatment of marital rapeReferences
R v. L [1991] H.C.A. 48; (1991) 174 C.L.R. 379, 40, 2.
See generally, K.N.CHANDRASHEKHARAN PILLAI, WOMEN AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, ENGENDERING LAW, ESSAYS IN HONOR OF LOTIKA SARKAR (Amita Dhanda & Archana Parashar Eds., 1999); DWARKA NATH MITTER, THE POSITION OF WOMEN IN HINDU LAW (1913); A.S. ALTEKAR, THE POSITION OF WOMEN IN HINDU CIVILIZATION (2nd ed. 1959).
R. THORNHILL & C. T. PALMER, A NATURAL HISTORY OF RAPE-BIOLOGICAL BASES OR SEXUAL COERCION (1 ed., 2000); R. THORNHILL & N. THORNHILL, THE EVOLUION OF PSCHOLOGICAL PAIN, IN SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE (R. Bell N. Bell eds., 1989).
Id.
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NATIONAL CRIME RECORDS BUREAU, Crime in India 2012, Chapter 5, available at http://ncrb.gov.in/ (last visited Mar. 10, 2014).
JUSTICE VERMA COMMITTEE ON AMENDMENTS TO CRIMINAL LAW, Report of the Committee on Amendments to Criminal Law (January 23, 2013).
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.
BLACKSTONE, COMMENTARIES ON ENGLISH LAW 442 (PUB, 1844); See, supra note 1.
Charlotte L. Mitra, For She Has No Right To Give Consent, 1979 Cr. L. J 558.
JULIA R. & HERMAN SCHEWENDINGER, RAPE AND INEQUALITY 95 (PUB. 1993).
Supra note 7 at 112.
L.H.V Prasad v. Station House Officer, Alwal Police Station, 1999 Cr.L.J. 3928 (A.P.).
People v. Liberta, 64 N.Y. 2nd 152, 485 N.Y.S. 2nd 207 (1984).
V. Barshis, The Question of Marital Rape, 6 WOMEN’S STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM 383, 383-393 (1983).
A.I.R. 1997 S.C. 3011.
A.I.R. 1999 S.C. 625.
See generally THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, Art. 21; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art. 10 Dec. 16, 1966, 999 UNTS 171; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, preamble, arts. 12, 13 Dec. 16, 1966, 993 UNTS 3; THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, Arts. 14, 15, 16; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, preamble, arts. 3, 7, 13 Dec. 16, 1966, 993 UNTS 3; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, preamble, arts. 3, 14, 23, 26 Dec. 16, 1966, 999 UNTS 171; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 16 .A. res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc A/810 at 71 1948.
LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA, 84th Report on Rape and Allied Offences: Some Questions of Substantive Law, Procedure and Evidence (1980), available at http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/51-100/Report84.pdf. (last visited 10 Mar. 2014).
Id. at 7. See also LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA, 42nd Report on Indian Penal Code (1971), available at http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/1-50/Report42.pdf (last visited 10 Mar. 2014).
Supra note 17 at 8.
See also, Declaration on Elimination of Violence against Women, 1967 art. 14 A/RES/48/104; Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, arts. 11(1), 22, 24, 29 G.A. Res. 34/180, 34 UN GAOR Supp. (No. 46) at 193, UN Doc. A/34/46.
See, Ashwin Abhinav, A Comparative Analysis in Socio-legal Perspectives, 29 (1 &2) IND. SOCIO-LEGAL J. 73 (2009); Batra Majula, Marital Rape: Is There a Remedy?, 10(1) M.D.U. L. J. 205 (2005; Suchil Kumar Satpathy, Marital Rape, 104 CR.L.J 182 (1998); Subhash Chandra Singh, Marital Rape: A feminist View, 3 S. C. J. 45 (2002).
Supra note 20.
LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA, 42nd Report on Indian Penal Code (1971), available at http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/1-50/Report42.pdf (last visited 10 Mar. 2014) at 277-279 (Explanation II to proposed section 375).
Supra note 19.
LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA, 172nd Report on Review of Rape Laws (2000), available at http://www.lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/rapelaws.htm. (last visited 10 Mar. 2014).
See also, Declaration on Elimination of Violence against Women, art. 14 A/RES/48/104; Articles 11(1), 22, 24 & 29, Convention on Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women, arts. 11(1), 22, 24, 29 G.A. Res. 34/180, 34 UN GAOR Supp. (No. 46) at 193, UN Doc. A/34/46.
Supra note 7.
Bharti Jain & Rakhi Chakrabarty, Govt justifies exclusion of marital rape as sexual offence in amended ordinance, TIMES OF INDIA, Feb. 19, 2013, available at http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-02-19/india/37179234_1_sexual-offence-live-in-partner-home-secretary.
PEN. CODE § 376 B.
Queen Empress, (1890) I.L.R Cal. 49.
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, § 2(d).
Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, § 15.
LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA, Proposal To Amend The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 And Other Allied Laws, Report No. 205 (2008), available at http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/report205.pdf.
UNICEF, EARLY MARRIAGE, A HARMFUL TRADITIONAL PRACTICE: A STATISTICAL EXPLORATION (2005), available at http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/Early_Marriage_12.lo.pdf; Convention on the Rights of the Child, Nov. 20, 1989, 1577 U.N.T.S. 3.
Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, § 15.
India: Third and Fourth Combined Periodic Report on the CRC draft, Inputs of West Bengal State, 9-10 (2007) available at http://wcd.nic.in/crc3n4/crc3n4_1r.pdf.
Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, § 2 (a).
Court on its Own Motion (Lajja Devi) v. State 2013 Cri.L.J. 3458.
See, VASUDHA DHAGAMWAR, LAW, POWER AND JUSTICE: THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL RIGHTS IN THE INDIAN PENAL CODE 113 (2nd ed. 2010); JULIA ALLISON & LAWRENCE WRIGHTSMAN, RAPE: THE MISUNDERSTOOD CRIME 85-6 (1993).
National Family Health Survey of 2005-2006 (NFHS-3), available at http://www.nfhsindia.org/ (The NFHS-3 facts and figures mentioned hereafter have all been retrieved from this website) (last visited Dec. 1, 2013).
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, § 13 (2) (ii) (Amendment 1976); Indian Divorce Act, 1869, § 10; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, § 32 (d) (Amendment 1988); Special Marriage Act, 1954, § 27 (1-A) (i).
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, § 13 (1) (ia) (Amendment 1976); Dissolution of Muslim Marriage act, 1939 § 2 (viii); Indian Divorce Act, 1869, § 10; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, § 32 (dd) (Amendment 1988); Special Marriage Act, 1954, § 27 (1) (d).
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, § 9 (Amendment 1976); Indian Divorce Act, 1869, § 32; Special Marriage Act, 1954, § 27 (1) (d).
PEN. CODE § 37.
PEN. CODE § 376(1) (It is punishable with minimum imprisonment of two years extending to seven years).
PEN. CODE § 376 (2) (i).
PEN. CODE § 376 B.
PEN. CODE § 376 (2) (f).
Supra notes 1 and 9.
BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 564 (5th ed., 1979).
(2012) 5 S.C.C. 342; See generally, VASUDHA DHAGAMWAR, LAW, POWER AND JUSTICE: PROTECTION OF PERSONAL RIGHTS IN THE INDIA PENAL CODE (2nd ed. 2009).
S.C.R. (1) 402.
Kounteya Sinha, 57% of boys, 53% of girls think wife beating is justified, TIMES OF INDIA, Apr. 25, 2012 available at http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-04-25/india/31398208_1_domestic-violence-spousal-violence-centre-for-social-research.
D. NICOLSAN & L. BIBBINGS, FEMINIST PERSPECTIVE 185 (1st ed. 2000).
Supra notes 50-53.
Supra notes 16-21.
(2008) 6 S.C.C. 1.
