Prisoners’ Conjugal Visitation Rights in India: Changing Perspectives

Authors

  • Singh Anamika Third Year, BA, LLB (Hons.), RMNLU, Lucknow
  • Dasgupta Anupal Third Year, BA, LLB (Hons.), RMNLU, Lucknow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.7.5

Abstract

Right of conjugal visitation remains an old debate which has resurged recently with the Jasvir Singh decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The international community is divided over the boons and banes of such a benefit being extended to convicts. Some construe it as a privilege; the recent trends argue that the same is an extension of our basic human rights, constitutionally enshrined as being inherently ‘fundamental’ and hence sacrosanct. With the modern penal systems across the globe embracing the Reformative Theory of punishment, the idea that a criminal is a product of the social, economic and environmental conditions is increasingly gaining acceptance. By that logic, a better way to humanize the social ecology within the four walls of the prison and to reform that individual is by allowing conjugal visitation. The article is primarily a stakeholder analysis of the problem, the key stakeholders being the prisoner, his/her spouse, the correctional department and the society. It will further discuss the possible benefits and the setbacks of conjugal visitation, the varied international stance and India’s take on the issue in light of the Jasvir Singh judgement. Finally, a determination will be attempted as to whether such a correctional provision is a right arising out of a broad interpretation of Article 21 of our Constitution.

Author Biographies

Singh Anamika, Third Year, BA, LLB (Hons.), RMNLU, Lucknow

Third Year, BA, LLB (Hons.), RMNLU, Lucknow

Dasgupta Anupal, Third Year, BA, LLB (Hons.), RMNLU, Lucknow

Third Year, BA, LLB (Hons.), RMNLU, Lucknow

References

Jasvir Singh, 2015 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 509.

Press Trust of India, Why can't Prisoners have Sex in jails, Court asks Maharashtra Govt, The Times of India, (Jan. 14, 2014), available at: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Why-cant-prisoners-have-sex-in-jails-court-asks-Maharashtra-govt/articleshow/5445590.cms.

Ruth S. Cavan & Eugene S. Zemans, Marital Relationships of Prisoners in Twenty-Eight Countries, 49(2), J. CRIM. L. CRIMINOLOGY & POLICE SCI., 185 (1958).

Id. at 186.

Deutsche Manipulationskunst, Gefälschte Abgaswerte von VW in den USA, Spiegel Online, available at:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,688736,00.html. (last visited on Sep. 14, 2015).

Giles Whittell, After the Gulag conjugal visits computers and a hint of violence, THE TIMES, Jun. 2, 2006.

Chalaram Krishna Reddy, (2000) 5 S.C.C. 712.

Jasvir Singh and Ors v. State of Punjab and Ors, 2015 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 509.

Johnson v. Phelan, 69 F.3d 144, 152 (1995).

D. Bhuvan Mohan Patnaik, (1975) 3 S.C.C. 185.

Sunil Batra-I, (1978) 4 S.C.C. 494.

Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, (1980) 3 S.C.C. 488.

Ms. G. Bhargavi, 2012 (5) A.L.D. 432.

Id.

Id.

R. D. Upadhyay, (2007) 15 S.C.C. 337.

Sherman Block, 468 U.S. 576.

Dickson, (2007) 46 E.H.R.R.

R v. Secretary, [2001] E.W.C.A. Civ. 472.

Jasvir Singh and Ors v. State of Punjab, 2015 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 509.

Donald P. Schenller, Conjugal Visitation - Prisoners's Privilege or Spouse's Right?, 2(2) NEW ENG. J. PRISON. L, 165 (1975).

Id. at 168.

Id. at 171.

C.T. Duffy, A Frank Discussion of the Prison Problem Nobody Talks About, This Week Magazine, Oct. 21, 1962 at 12.

C. Hopper, The Conjugal Visit at Mississippi State Penitentiary, 53 J. CRIM. L.C. & P.S. 342 (1962).

D. Clemmer, Observations on Imprisonment as a Source of Criminality, 41 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 311 (1950).

Norman Eliot Kent, Legal and Sociological Dimensions of Conjugal Visitation in Prisons, 2(47) NEW ENG. J. PRISON. L, 58 (1975).

Joseph K. Balough, Conjugal Visitations in Prisons: A Sociological Perspective, 28 FED. PROBATION. J, 57 (1964).

Downloads

Published

2021-08-13

How to Cite

Anamika, S., & Anupal, D. (2021). Prisoners’ Conjugal Visitation Rights in India: Changing Perspectives. Christ University Law Journal, 4(2), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.7.5