Corporate Guarantee: Computation of Guarantee Fees at Arm’s Length Price
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.8.2Abstract
The most recent controversy surrounding Indian tax courts, pertains to the issue of international transactions with respect to intra-group financing. It includes short as well as long term borrowing and lending, guarantees etc. The debate centres around transfer pricing (herein after referred to 'TP') provisions and how the computation of arm’s length price is to be done. The article has focussed on one aspect of intra group financing, that is, the provision of corporate guarantee. The paper first describes the meaning of guarantee and then highlights various provisions relating to corporate guarantee, under the Companies Act, 2013 and the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999. The article then describes various legislative provisions relating to the transfer pricing issue and how guarantees fit into such provisions. It is ambiguous, as courts have not provided for a settled principle, in this regard. The author, thus, highlights various approaches the Indian tax courts have adopted when the issue of corporate guarantee came before them. The paper provides an answer to the issue of whether the guarantee fee can be computed at arm’s length price, using compared uncontrolled price as the method for computation. The author concludes by stating that while the courts have attempted to resolve these ambiguities, there is still scope for further reform.References
* Third Year, BA LLB (Hons), National Law University, Odisha; vinti.aggar@gmail.com.
Indian Contract Act, 1872, §126.
LORD HAILSHAM,HALSBURY’S LAWS OF ENGLAND,49 (LexisNexis, 4thed. 2003).
Id.
Sagar Gupta, Section 185 of Companies Act, 2013 – Loan to Directors,Taxguru (July 3, 2014), available at http://taxguru.in/company-law/section-185-companies-act-2013-loan-directors.html.
Id.
Ministry Of Corporate Affairs, General Circular No 03/2014, Dated: 14/2/2014, Clarification With Regard To Section 185 And 186 Of The Companies Act, 2013 — Loans And Advances To Employees – Reg., available at http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/Circular_04_ 10032015.pdf.
Income Tax Act, 1961, § 92A.
Income Tax Act, 1961,§ 92A (d).
Case No. IR 97/88, dated 30th May 1990.
Prem Sikka & Hugh Willott, The Dark Side Of Transfer Pricing: Its Role In Tax Avoidance And Wealth Retentiveness, 21JOURNAL OF CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 345 (2010).
MUKESHBUTANI, TRANSFER PRICING: AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE 60 (LexisNexis Butterworths,2nd ed. 2007).
SAMPATHIYENGAR, LAW OF INCOME TAX , 8069 (Bharat Law Publications,11th ed. 1941).
Income Tax Act, 1861, §92CB.
Income Tax Rules, 1962, Rule 10TB(3).
Income Tax Rules, 1962, Rule 10TC.
Sandeep Sharma, Safe Harbour Rules – Transfer Pricing, Taxguru (Jan 11, 2014),available at http://tax guru.in/income-tax/safe-harbour-rules-transfer-pricing.html.
Finance Act, 2012 (23 of 2012) (w.e.f. 1.04.2012).
Four Soft Pvt. Ltd. v. D.C.I.T., (2014) 164 TTJ 561.
Income Tax Act, 1861, §92B.
Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Addl. C.I.T., ITA no. 5816/Del/2012.
Redington (India) Ltd. v. J.C.I.T., ITA no. 513/Mds/2014.
Income Tax Act, 1861, §92B.
Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd. v. A.C.I.T. (L.T.U.), (2015) 167 TTJ 204.
Id.
S.A Builders Ltd. v. C.I.T., (2007) 288 ITR 1 (SC).
C.I.T., Punjab, Haryana, J. & K., H.P. & Union Territory of Chandigarh v. Panipat Woollen& General Mills Co. Ltd., (1976) 103 ITR 66 (SC).
A.C.I.T. v. Nimbus Communication Ltd., (2014) 30 ITR 349; A.C.I.T. v. W. S. Industries (India) Ltd., (2011) 9 ITR 596.
C.I.T. v. Walchand& Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., (1967) 65 ITR 381 (SC); see also C.I.T. v. Sales Magnesite (Pvt.) Ltd., (1995) 214 ITR 1.
Kirby Building Systems India Ltd. v. A.C.I.T., (2014) 166 TTJ 294.
A. MICHAEL HEIMERT & MICHELLE JOHNSON, GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER PRICING: LAW, TAX PLANNING AND COMPLIANCE STRATEGIES 18 (2010).
D.C.I.T. v. M/s Lear Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., (2014) 148 ITD 575.
Kohinoor Food Ltd. v. A.C.I.T., ITA no. 3669/Del/2012.
Id.
OECD TRANSFER PRICING GUIDELINES FOR MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND TAX ADMINISTRATION (1995) ¶7.9.
Rahul K Mitra, Intra-Group Services And Shareholder Activities, Transfer Pricing, 15 INTL. JOURNAL BLOOMBERG BNA 3 (2014).
JakobBundgaard, Tax Law On Intra-Group And Shareholder Security From A Transfer Pricing Perspective, INTL. TRANSFER PRICING JOURNAL 81 (2006).
OECD TRANSFER PRICING GUIDELINES FOR MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND TAX ADMINISTRATION (1995), ¶7.13.
General Electric Canada Inc. v.The Queen, (2009) TCC 563.
Prolifics Corporation Ltd. v. D.C.I.T., ITA no. 237/Hyd/2014.
Hales S.J.,Determining Arm's-Length Guarantee Fees, 39TM INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL 156 (2010).
Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd. v. A.C.I.T. (L.T.U.), (2015) 167 TTJ 204.
Raymer Mcquiston, Drafting An Enforceable Guaranty In An International Financing Transaction: A Lender's Perspective, 10 BERKELEY JOURNAL OF INTL. LAW 4 (1993).
Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd. v. A.C.I.T. (L.T.U.), (2015) 167 TTJ 204.
Working Draft On Transfer Pricing Methods, available at http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/tax/2011_TP/TP_Chapter5_Methods.pdf.(last visited Sept. 15, 2015).
Serdia Pharmaceuticals (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. A.C.I.T., (2011) 136 TTJ 129.
Aztec Software and Technology Services Ltd. v. A.C.I.T., (2007) 109 TTJ 892.
D.C.I.T. v. C.M.A. C.O.M. Global India (Pvt.) Ltd., (2013) 151 TTJ 18.
Id.
Reliance Industries Ltd. v. A.C.I.T., ITA no. 4537/Mum/2007.
Asian Paints Ltd. v. A.C.I.T. (L.T.U.), ITA no. 1686/Mum/2010.
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. A.C.I.T., ITA no. 5031/Mum/2012.
Four Soft Pvt. Ltd. v. D.C.I.T., (2014) 164 TTJ 561.
Aztec Software and Technology Services Ltd. v. A.C.I.T., (2007) 109 TTJ 892.
Id.
A.C.I.T.Vapi Circle,Vapi v. Micro Inks Ltd., ITA no. 1442/Ahd/2006.
Reg. § 1.482-3(b)(2)(ii)(A).
R.B.S. Equities (India) Ltd. v. Additional Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, IT Appeal No. 3077 (Mum) of 2009.
ROBERT FEINSCHREIBER, TRANSFER PRICING METHODS: AN APPLICATION GUIDE 234 (2004).
Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India. IT No. 7514/Mum/2013.
