Metaphor and Concept: Some Reflections on the Derrida-Ricoeur Debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12726/tjp.33.1Keywords:
metaphor, concept, Derrida, Ricoeur, paradigm shift, deconstruction, hermeneuticsAbstract
The debate between Jacques Derrida and Paul Ricoeur on the philosophical status of metaphor has been seen as between two positions, one which privileges the destabilizing power of the metaphoric over the conceptual (Derrida) and the other which domesticates the metaphoric in the service of the conceptual (Ricoeur). Commentators on this debate, no matter where their sympathies lie, seem to predominantly be in agreement on this issue. In this paper I attempt to invert the frame within which this debate has been viewed. I argue that the debate can more fruitfully be read not as one on the status of metaphor in philosophy, but rather on the task of concept-construction in philosophy. I also argue that in reading this debate from this perspective, we come across a rather surprising conclusion: that it is Derrida, rather than Ricoeur, who provides us with a more robust and profitable mode of concept-construction that can accommodate scientific revolutions, epistemological breaks, and paradigm shifts. Ricoeur’s model of concept construction, I argue, only functions within what Thomas Kuhn has called ‘normal science’.
References
Bachelard, G. (2002). The formation of the scientific mind: A contribution to a psychoanalysis of objective knowledge. Clinamen Press.
Clark, S. H. (1990). Paul Ricoeur. London: Routledge.
Derrida, J. (2011). Retrait of Metaphor. In J. Derrida, & J. Wolfreys (Ed.), The Derrida Reader: Writing Performance (pp. 102-130). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Derrida, J. (2024). White Mythology. In J. Derrida, Margins of Philosophy (pp. 207-273). New Delhi: Dev Publishers.
Heidegger, M. (1991). The Principle of Reason. (R. Lilly, Trans.) Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Lawlor, L. (1992). Imagination and Chance: The Difference Between the Thought of Ricoeur and Derrida. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2003). The Rule of Metaphor: The Creation of Meaning in Language. (R. Czerny, K. McLaughlin, & J. Costello, Trans.) London: Routledge.
Stellardi, G. (2000). Heidegger and Derrida on Philosophy and Metaphor: Imperfect Thought. Amherst, New York: Humanity Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Huzaifa Omair Siddiqi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
