Attacks on United Nations Peacekeeping Forces: A Violation of International Humanitarian Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.7.2Abstract
This paper raises the question as to whether the United Nations peacekeeping forces could be awarded a civilian status during the armed conflict in which they are deployed; which is important for the determination of prohibition of attacks against them. The paper is based on the premise that distinction between civilians and combatants is crucial under international humanitarian law. In doing so, this paper briefly analyses the nature of UN peacekeeping operations and the qualification of the UN forces’ members as civilians or combatants. It also delves into the emerging category of UN robust peacekeeping operations to ascertain whether its personnel would be treated as civilians or combatants in the context of an international armed conflict.References
(E.g. UNOSOM I in Somalia and UNAMIR I, as well as AMIS in Sudan).
(E.g. ONUC, IEMF and the United Nations Force Intervations Brigade FIB in the Democratic Republic of Congo; UNITAF, UNOSOM II in Somalia (at the begining); the Turquise Operation in Ruanda; ECOMOG in Sierra Leone and UNMIS in Darfur).
(E.g. MONUC and MONUSCO in Congo, UNOSOM II in Somalia, UNAMIR I and II in Rwanda, UNAMSIL in Sierra Leone, UNMIS and UNAMID in Darfur).
Charter of the United Nations, Preamble.
Charter of the United Nations art. 1, Oct. 24, 1945, 1 UNTS XVI.
U.N. Doc. A/59/565 (2004), ¶ 29.
Robert Cryer, The Security Council and Article 39: A Threat to Coherence?, 1(2) J CONFLICT SECURITY LAW 161, 161-62 (1996); Lothar Brock, Von der humanitären Intervention zur Responsibility to Protect: Kriegserfahrung und Völkerrechtsentwicklung seit dem Ende des Ost-West-Konflikts, in FREIHEIT, FESTSCHRIFT FUR MICHAEL BOTHE 19, 23 (A. Frischer-Lescano et al. Eds.., 2008); Fred Grünfeld, Human Rights Violations: A Threat to International Peace and Security, in THE ROLE OF THE NATION-STATE IN THE 21ST CENTURY, HUMAN RIGHTS, INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS AND FOREIGN POLICY 427, 427 (M. Castermans-Holleman ed., 1998); INGER ÖSTERDAHL, THREAT TO THE PEACE: THE INTERPRETATION BY THE SECURITY COUNCIL OF ARTICLE 39 OF THE UN CHARTER 26-7 (1998); Karel Wellens, The UN Security Council and New Threats to the Peace: Back to the Future, J CONFLICT SECURITY LAW 8, 15, 43-6 (2003); MICHAEL E. BROWN, THE INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS OF CONFLICT 594 (M. Brown ed. MIT Press, 1996).
Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel art. 9, Dec. 09, 1994.
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court art. 8, Jul. 17, 1998.
Eno Robert Wundeh, United Nations Peacekeeping Operations and Respect for Human Rights, 24 SOUTH AFRICAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 76 - 77 (1999).
UN Doc. A/47/277/ (1992), ¶ 15.
UN Doc. A/47/277 (1992), ¶ 20.
NIGEL D. WHITE, KEEPING THE PEACE: THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE MAINTENANCE OF INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND SECURITY (Manchester University Press, 3rd ed., 1997); UNITED NATIONS, THE BLUE HELMETS - A REVIEW OF UNITED NATIONS PEACE - KEEPING (New York United Nations 3rd ed., 1996); Sally Morphet, UN Peacekeeping and Election - Montering, in UNITED NATIONS DIVIED WORLD 201 (Adam Roberts and Benedict Kingsbury ed., 2007); Shyla Vohra, Impartiality in United Nations Peace-Keeping, 9(1) LEIDEN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 63, 76(1996).
Eno Robert Wundeh, United Nations Peacekeeping Operations and Respect for Human Rights, 24 SOUTH AFRICAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 76, 77 (1999).
UN Doc. A/3943 §127, Oct. 09, 1948.
United Nations Peacekeeping, Mandates and the legal basis for peacekeeping, UNITED NATION ORGANISATION, available at, http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/operations/pkmandates.shtml (last visited on May 18, 2015).
MOHAMED A. OSMAN, THE UNITED NATIONS AND PEACE ENFORCEMENT: WARS, TERRORISM AND DEMOCRACY 52-53 (Ashgate Publishing, 2002); John Quigley, The "privatization" of Security Council Enforcement Action: a Threat to Multilateralism, 17 MICHIGAN JIL 249, 262 (1996); TREVOR FINDLAY, THE USE OF FORCE IN UN PEACE OPERATIONS 376 (Sipri & Oxford University Press, 2002).
Charter of the United Nations art. 39, Oct. 24, 1945, 1 UNTS XVI.
United Nations Peacekeeping, Principles and Guidelines, UNITED NATIONS ORGANISATION, available at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/operations/principles.shtml (last visited on May 19, 2015); Headquarters Department of the Army, US Army's Field Manual - FM 100-23 Peace Operations, CENTRE FOR DISASTER MANGAEMENT AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE, available at http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/100-23/index.html (last visited on May 12, 2015); Headquarters Department of the Army, Peace Operations Multi-service tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Conducting Peace Operations, BITS, (Oct. 26, 2003) http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/3-07-31/fm3_07x31.pdf.
Hugo Slim, Military Humanitarianism and the New Peacekeeping: An Agenda forPeace? THE JOURNAL OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE, (Sep. 22, 1995), https://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/64; Jane Boulden, Peace Enforcement: The United Nations Experience in Congo, Somalia, and Bosnia, 1 POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY 117, 163 (2013); Jit Rikhye, Sovereignty and International Intervention in the Internal Affairs of States: Peacekeeping Operations, in THE DUMBARTON OAKS CONVERSATIONS AND THE UNITED NATIONS 73 (Ernest R. May and Angeliki E. Laiou eds., 1998); Nicholas Tsagourias, Consent, Neutrality/Impartiality and the Use of Force in Peacekeeping: their constitutional dimension, 11 JOURNAL OF CONFLICT AND SECURITY LAW 465, 469 (2006); George F. Oliver, The Other Side of Peacekeeping: peace enforcement and who should do it?, 8 INTL. PEACEKEEPING: THE YEARBOOK OF INTL PEACE OPERATIONS 102 (2004).
Annan K, Statement by the United Nations Secretary-General Before the special commemorative meeting of the general assemby honouring 50 years of peacekeeping, INTERNATIONAL PEACEKEEPING, (Oct. 06, 1998), http://www.un.org/Depts/DPKO/pk5060sg.htm; Geroge F Oliver, The Other Side of Peacekeeping: Peace Enforcement and Who Should Do It?, 8 INTL. PEACEKEEPING: THE YEARBOOK OF INTL PEACE OPERATIONS 101, 109 (2002); KAREN MINGST & MARGARET KARNS, THE UNITED NATIONS IN THE POST-COLD WAR ERA 82 (Boulder, WestviewPress, 1995 2nd ed., 2000).
N., Tsagourias, Consent, Neutrality/ Impartiality and the Use of Force in Peacekeeping: Their Constitutional Dimension, 11(3) J.C.S.L., 472 (2006).
Speical Research Report, Special Research Report No. 1: Security Council Action Under Chapter VII: Myths and Realities, SECURITY COUNCIL REPORT, (Jun. 23, 2008), http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/special-research-report/lookup-c-glKWLeMTIsG-b-4202671.php.
U.N. Doc., A/55/305-S/2000/809 (2000); U.N. Doc., A/57/767 (2003) 4, ¶ 26.
N.D. White, Keeping the Peace, THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE MAINTENANCE OF PEACE AND SECURITY, 228-9 (Manchester Univ Press; 2 Sub edition 1998); Ove Bring, Peacekeeping and Peacemaking: prospective issues for the United Nations, 20 MULR 55, 60-1 (1995); David N. Gibbs, The United Nations, International Peacekeeping and the Question of “impartiality”: revisiting the Congo Operation of 1960, 38 J MOD AFR STUD 259, 360 (2000); (Some Examples are: MONUC in Congo; UNOSOM II in Somalia; UNAMIR in Rwanda; UNPROFOR in Bosnia).
HUG BREAKEY, ANGUS FRANCIS, VESSELIN POPOVSKI ET AL., ENHANCING PROTECTION CAPACITY: POLICY GUIDE TO THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT AND THE PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS, at 8, available at http://isp.unu.edu/publications/files/R2P_POC_Overview_Document.pdf; (last visited on Sep. 12, 2015); Kindred, Hugh M., The Protection of Peacekeepers, 33 CANADIAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 257, 263 (1995).
Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel art 9-16, Dec. 09, 1994.
U.N. Doc. ST/SGB/1999/13, § 1; Devon Whittle, Application of International Humanitarian Law to United Nations Forces, 46 GEORGETOWN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 837, 840-41 (2015).
United Nations Peacekeeping Operations, Principles and Guidelines, ¶18.
U.N.S.G., REP. NO. S/2015/486, ¶¶ 19-22 at 6-7 (2015); Magdalena Pacholska, (Il)legality of Killing Peacekeepers, The Crime of Attaching Peacekeepers in the Jurisprudence of International Criminal Tribunals, 1 J INT CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 25 (2015); Devon Whittle, Application of International Humanitarian Law to United Nations Forces, 46 GEORGETOWN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 837, 838-41 (2015).
Rule 33: Personnel and Objects Involved in a Peacekeeping Mission, International Committee of the Red Cross, https://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule33 (last visited on Sep. 09, 2015).
The Rome Statute of International Criminal Court art. 8 b) (iii), Statute of the Special Court of Sierra Leone, art. 4 (b).
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions, 12 August 1949; Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) art. 51(3), Jun. 08, 1977; Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) art. 13(3).
ELADIO ARROYO LARA, LA NO BELIGERANCIA: ANALYSIS JURIDICO 126, 146 (La Laguna ed., 1981).
U.N. General Assembly-Security Council, Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations, A/55/305/-S/2000/809 §50 (Aug. 21, 2000).
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INFORMATION, THE BLUE HELMETS: A REVIEW OF UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING 350, 4 (New York United Nations, 1985); MOHAMED A. OSMAN, THE UNITED NATIONS AND PEACE ENFORCEMENT: WARS, TERRORISM AND DEMOCRACY 17 (Ashgate Publishing, 2002).
Ademola Abbas, The United Nations, the African Union and the Darfur Crisis, 54(3) NETH. INT. LAW REV. 415, 430 (2007); Papastavridis, Interpretation of Security Council resolution under Chapter VII in the aftermath of the Iraqui Crisis, 56 ICLQ 83 (2007); Frederic L Krigis, Security Council Resolution 1441 on Iraq’s Final Opportunity to Comply with Disarmament Obligations, (Nov. 10, 2002) http://www.asil.org/insights/volume/7/issue/12/security-council-resolution-1441-iraqs-final-opportunity-comply (last visited on Aug. 19, 2015); Patrick McLaren, Settling the Score with Saddam: Resolution 1441 and Parallel Justifications for the Use of Force against Iraq, 13 DUKE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW 233 (2003); Ademola Abass, The Implementation of ECOWAS' New Protocol and Security Council Resolution 1270 in Sierra Leone: New Developments in Regional Intervention, 10 U. MIAMI INT’L& COMP. L. REV. 177, 185-86 (2001), available at http://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1143&context=umiclr (last visited on Aug. 19, 2015).
SCSL Ruf Case, ¶ 1908.
SCSL Ruf Case, ¶ 1917.
SCSL Ruf Case, ¶ 1910-11.
SCSL Ruf Case, ¶ 233.
J. Solan, Peacekeepers under Fire: Prosecuting the RUF for Attacks against the UN Assistance Mission in Sierra Leone, 9 THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNAS 243, 282-84 (2010).
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Third Report on the Human Rights Situation in Colombia, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.102 Doc. 9 rev. 1, Feb. 26, 1999, ¶ 53.
Prosecutor v Dusko Tadic [1997] I.C.T.Y. Judgement, Case No. IT-94-1-T, 60 – 65.; Jean-François Quéguiner, Direct Partitipation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law, INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OF THE RED CROSS 4-6 (Sep., 2003) https://www.icrc.org/ara/assets/files/ other/ direct_participation_in_hostilities_sept_2003_eng.pdf (last visited on Sep. 09, 2015).
SCSL RUF case, ¶ 234.
Magdalena Pacholska, (Il)legality of Killing Peacekeepers, The Crime of Attaching Peacekeepers in the Jurisprudence of International Criminal Tribunals, 1 INT. CRIMINAL JUSTICE JOURNAL 4, 11 (2015).
Jann K. Kleffner, The Notions of civilians and Fighters in Non-International Armed Conflicts, Conduct of Hostilities Revisiting the Law of Armed Conflict, INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HUMANITARIAN LAW 67, 72 (Gian Luca Beruto, 2008); Nils Melzer, Direct Participation in Hostilities, I.C.R.C. 16, 33-4, 71 (2009).
Additional Protocol I art. 43 (1,2) (1977); Geneva Convention III relative to the Treatment of Prisioners of War art 4(2) (1949).
KLEFFNER, supra note at 47.
United Nations Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel arts. 7, 9, U.N. Doc, ST/SGB/1999/13 (1999).
