DNA Barcoding of Fish Fauna Using Mitochondrial CO1 Gene
Keywords:
DNA barcoding, DNA sequencing, Mitochondrial CO1 gene, Molecular taxonomy, Biodiversity assessmentAbstract
This study aimed to investigate the quantitative relationships between four fish species from three genera based on molecular analyses (barcoding) of nine species from five genera utilizing the mitochondrial COI gene. Species within the same genus showed more transitional incompatibilities than transversional mismatches. The samples were divided into four main groups by a phylogenetic tree built from the sequencing data (cytochrome COI) of samples from the two populations using the neighbour-joining method. As dissimilar species were clustered under separate nodes and similar species were clustered under the same nodes, the neighbour-joining tree revealed various clusters corresponding to the taxonomic status of the species. In conclusion, the mitochondrial CO1 gene is a useful molecular marker for DNA barcoding.
References
F. Jim et al., “Comparative analysis of nutritional value of Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus), Nile tilapia, meat from three different ecosystems,” J. Food Qual., pp. 5-10, 2017.
Rust. BM, Nutritional Physiology, 2003, pp. 367-452.
J. H. Tidwell and G. L. Allan, “Fish as food: Aquaculture’s contribution. Ecological and economic impacts and contributions of fish farming and capture fisheries,” EMBO Rep., vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 958-963, 2001 [doi:10.1093/embo-reports/kve236].
K. G. Padmakumar et al., “Etroplus suratensis (Bloch), the State Fish of Kerala,” J. Biosci., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 925-931, 2012 [doi:10.1007/s12038-012-9271-x].
Gunawickrama and K. B. Suneetha, “Morphological heterogeneity and population differentiation in the Green chromide in Sri Lanka,” Ruhuna J. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 70-81, 2007.
Shyam et al., “Sardine economy of Kerala: Paradigms and Perspectives,” Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 351-356, 2015.
P. V. Kagwade, “The food and feeding habits of the Indian oil sardine Sardinella longiceps Valenciennes,” Indian J. Fish., vol. 11a, no. 1, pp. 345-370, 1964.
R. Froese and D. Pauly, 2008, “FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication,” Version (02 ⁄ 2009). Available at: http://www.fishbase.org.
E. G. Silas and P. P. Pillai, Resources of Tunas and Related Species and Their Fisheries in the Indian Ocean, 1982, pp. 10-15.
R. Froese, 2003, “FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication,” Version (02 ⁄ 2009). Available at: http://www.fishbase.org.
C. D. Webster and C. Lim, Tilapia: Biology, Culture, and Nutrition, 2006, pp. 5-6.
V. Sachithanandam et al., “DNA bar coding, phylogenetic diversity studies of Etroplus suratensis fish from Pooranankuppam brackish water, Puducherry,” Int. J. Curr. Res. Rev., vol. 04, pp. 33-42, 2012.
X. Bingpeng et al., “DNA barcoding for identification of fish species in the Taiwan Strait,”, PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. e0198109, 2018 [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198109].
J. Zhang and R. Hanner, “DNA barcoding is a useful tool for the identification of marine fishes from Japan,” Biochem. Syst. Ecol., vol. 39, no. 1, p. 31-42, 2011 [doi:10.1016/j.bse.2010.12.017].
J. K. Chambers et al., “AG protein-coupled receptor for UDP-glucose,” J. Biol. Chem., vol. 275, no. 15, p. 10767-10771, 2000 [doi:10.1074/jbc.275.15.10767].
R. Nagabhushanam and U. H. Mane, “Seasonal variation in the biochemical composition of Mytilus edulis at Ratnagiri on the west coast of India,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 69-72, 1978 [doi:10.1007/BF00018630].
Gopalsamy., Idayachandiran., Arumugam., Muthukumar., Kumaresan., Saravanan., Thangavel., Balasubramanian. (2014). Nutritional Value of Marine Bivalve, Donax cuneatus (Linnaeus, 1758) from Cuddalore Coastal Waters, Southeast Coast of India. Invention. 1-10.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jisha Jacob Valiyaparambil, Anisha S Menon, Manoj Mathews, Nandini N J
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
