An Autoethnography of Child Artists in Tamil Dance Reality Television Production
Keywords:Autoethnography, Child Artist, Tamil Television, Dance Reality Production, Biopolitics
Reality Television shows that revolve around the lives of children have become popular to audiences of all ages, which is evident in their success across diverse channels and various demographics (Palmer, 2013). With the increase in the number of reality shows and child participants in them, emerges a critical need of questioning the power of those in authority and are in- charge of production over the powerless group (the children) who aren’t of an age to legally possess the right to consent on their work, but have become the primary focus of almost every aspect of media commercialisation. An analysis of the conditions and effects of child participation in reality shows is extremely complex as it is difficult to make a child share his/her experience with others. It is also true that the history of children’s daily experiences are extremely difficult to trace, since children themselves have had little or no access to those public forms of expression (Holland, 2004).
This paper is an autoethnographic study that explores Tamil dance reality television's child artists during the period 2008-2020.The bodily performances of the dance reality television’s child artists and crew are studied by focusing on the intersections of body and space and with them developing in this context the concept of Biopolitics, as advanced by Michel Foucault (1979). The qualitative study covers a sample of 8 dance reality shows in five different Tamil channels with a focus on 12 child artists and how they spend their everyday lives in the shooting sets, rehearsal studios and other media production spaces. The researcher, being an insider in the reality television programmes, as a freelance floor director and coordinator for more than ten years now, provides this paper a significant leverage of the same and uses methods of memory work and self-reflexive writing along with in-depth interviews.
Adams, T.E., Ellis, C. & Jones, S.H. (2017). "Autoethnography": The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from: https:// doi.org/ 10.1002/ 9781118901731.iecrm0011
Andrejevic, M. (2008). Watching Television without Pity: The Productivity of Online Fans. Television & New Media, 9(1), 24–46.
Biressi, A. & Nunn, H. Ed. C Carter, L. Steiner, L. Mclaughlin (2013). Class, Gender and the Docusoap: The Only Way Is Essex. The Routledge Companion to Media & Gender, pp.269-79.
Bhattacharjee, S. 2014. Sophisticated Work Done by Children is Child Labour: An Overview of Children Working in Industries. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 6 (2), 45-52.
Bochner, A. P. (2000). Criteria against ourselves. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 266-272.
Benjamin, W. (1969). Arendt, H. (Ed.). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. New York: Schock Books.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1994). Personal experience methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (413-427). London: Sage.
Cianci, C. (2008). Entertainment or Exploitation? Reality Television and the Inadequate Protection of Child Participants under the Law. Interdisciplinary Law Journal, Southern California, 18 (2), 363-394.
Devantier, T. (2006). Extraordinary Jobs in Entertainment. Infobase Publishers.
Ellis, C. (1991). Sociological Introspection and Emotional Experience. Symbolic Interaction. 14 (1), 23-50.
Ellis, C. & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject.
Ellis, C. (2004). A Methodological Novel about autoethnography. CA: Rowman Altamira
Ellis, C. (2007). Telling Secrets, Revealing lives: Relational Ethics in Research with Intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 3-29.
Ellis, C., Adams, T.E. & Bochner, A. (2011). Autoethnography: an Overview. Historical Social Research. 273-290
Ellis, C. & Bochner, A. (2016). Evocative Autoethnography: Writing Lives and Tellin Stories. Taylor & Francis.
Foucault, M. (1997). “The Birth of Biopolitics”. Ethics, Subjectivity, and Truth: P. Rabinow and J.D. Faubion eds. New Press. (73-79)
Foucault, M. (2003). Lecture 11, 17 March 1976, Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France. Picador Press. (239-264)
Goldschmidt, W. (1977). Anthropology and the coming Crisis: An Autoethnographic appraisal. American Anthropologist, 293-308. https:// anthrosource. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/abs/ 10.1525/ aa.1977.79.2.02a00060
Greenhalgh, T. (2001). Storytelling Should Be Targeted Where it is known to have Greatest Added Value. Medical Education. 35 (9).
Hayano, D.M. (1979). Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, Problems, and Prospects. Human Organisation, 38, 99-104. https:// doi.org/ 10.17730/ humo.38.1.u761n5601t4g318v Accessed 18 April 2020.
Heider, K.G. (1975). What do people do? Dani Auto-ethnography. Journal of Anthropological Research, 31, 3-17. https:// www.journals. uchicago.edu/ doi/10.1086/jar.31.1.3629504
Hill, A. (2005). Book Review: Understanding Celebrity. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(3), 379–381.
Holland, P. (2004). Picturing childhood: the myth of the child in popular imagery. London: I.B. Tauris.
Horkheimer, M. (2002). Critical Theory. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.
Lazzarato, M. (2009). “Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity, and the Reconstitution of the Social”. Theory, Culture & Society. Vol. 26, no. 6.
Lefebvre, H. (1991).Critique of Everyday Life. Vol.1. London: Verso.
Levey, H. 2010. Balloon boy "plus ei8ht?" children and reality television. Sage Publications, American Sociological Association, 9 (2), 72-75.
Murray, S. & OulLette, L. (Ed.). (2004). Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture. (2nd ed.) New York University Press.
National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, 2010-2011. Guidelines to Regulate Child Participation in TV Serials, Reality Shows and Advertisements. 1-16. Retrieved from: https:// mib.gov.in/ sites / default/files/pc7.pdf.
O’Connor, J. (2008). The Cultural Significance of the Child Star. New York: Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from: file:/// E:/References%20% 20PDF/Research%20Articles/Everyday%20Life/[Jane_C_O'Connor]_The_Cultural_Significance_of_the(z-lib.org).pdf
Palmer, L. (2013). Sluts, Brats, and Sextuplets: The Dangers of Reality Television for Children and Teen. Popular Culture Association in the South, 36 (1), 123-143.
Parham, L.D. & Fazio, L.S. (1997). Play in occupational therapy for children. St. Louis: Mosby
Pelia, R. (2004). A Methodology of the heart: Evoking Academic and Daily Life. Wallnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
Penzhorn, H. & Pitout, M. (2007). A critical-historical genre analysis of reality television Communication, 33 (1), 62–76.
Reed-Danahay, D. (Ed.). (1997). Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social. Oxford, UK: Berg.
Roberts, E. M. (2004). Through the Eyes of a Child: Representations of Blackness in Children’s Television Programming. Race, Gender, and Class in Media, 11 (2), 130–139.
Sparkes, A. C. (2000). Autoethnography and narratives of self: Reflections on criteria in action. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 21-43.
Venkatesh, S.P. (2020). Discipline, Control and Children in Tamil Reality Television. Deleuzian and Guattarian Approaches to Contemporary Communication Cultures in India. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Wall, S. (2006). An Autoethnography on Learning about Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(2).
Wayne, M. (2009). Marxism and Media Studies: Key Concepts and Contemporary Trends. South Asia: Aakar Books.
Copyright (c) 2020 Artha Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.