The Ticking Region of Korean Peninsula: A Playoff between Deterrence and Détente

Reviewing “The Korean Nuclear Imbroglio: Can India be a Muted Spectator?”

Authors

  • Rohini Sinha Department of International Studies, Political Science and History, CHRIST (Deemed University), , Bangalore, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.55.7

Keywords:

Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear Deterrence, Détente, Korean Peninsula, Nuclear Strategy, Denuclearization, North Korea

Abstract

The article in review, “The Korean Nuclear Imbroglio: Can India be a Muted Spectator?”, written by Sitakanta Mishra, brings to light the strategic environment of the region of North Asia and the Korean Peninsula. The region in question is increasingly characterised, for good reasons, by the impact it has to endure due to the nuclearisation of North Korea. Efforts to denuclearise North Korea has only, till now, achieved nothing more than a stalemate. This has raised concerns all over the world as North Korea progresses in the path of nuclearisation under the direction of an authoritarian regime to which the world has limited access. At a time, such as this, it is impractical to focus on approaches to manage the crisis without properly understanding and recognising North Korea’s security concerns which prompted it to become a nuclear power. Only after  grasping the full picture should the focus be on how to contain North Korea when it is engaging in activities which reflects an increase in its nuclear capabilities, thereby challenging the preservation of stability in not only the region of North Asia but the whole of Asia and the world. The strategic environment in the region is largely dictated by the dynamics of deterrence employed by both U.S-ROK and North Korea, which may have contributed to the ongoing crisis. The article then proceeds to highlight the need for a reevaluation of the Korean crisis from a non-western standpoint. Sitakanta Mishra attempts to usher in an Asian nation’s perspective by raising an important question as to what role should India, being a nuclear power itself and an aspiring superpower, play in this strategic narrative to resolve the worrisome nuclear crisis of North Korea.

References

Asia, U. (2019, April 22). Deterrence and Detente on the Korean Peninsula. Retrieved from Council on Foreign Relations: https:// www.cfr.org/ blog/deterrence-and-detente-korean-peninsula

Bandow, D. (2020, June 26). A Nuclear North Korea Won’t Be Stopped Through Deterrence: Why North Korea Needs Its Nukes. Retrieved from Foreign Policy: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/06/26/north-korea- nuclear-weapons-korean-war-deterrence/

Bermudez Jr., J. S. (2015, August 3). North Korea’s Development of a Nuclear Weapons Strategy. Retrieved from 38north: https:// www.38north.org/ wp-content/uploads/2015/08/NKNF_Nuclear-Weapons-Strategy_ Bermudez.pdf

Borrie, J., Caughley, T., & Wan, W. (2017, September 15). What North Korea Means – and Doesn’t – for Nuclear Deterrence. Retrieved from The Diplomat: https://thediplomat.com/2017/09/what-north-korea- means- and-doesnt-for-nuclear-deterrence/

Defense Dictionary, D. (1994). Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. Washington, D.C.: Government Publication Office.

Gamel, K. (2020, May 24). North Korean Leader Seeks More Nuclear Strength in First Appearance in Three Weeks. Retrieved from Stars and Stripes: https://www.stripes.com/news/north-korean-leader-seeks-more- nuclear-strength-in-first-appearance-in-three-weeks-1.631059

Jervis, R., Lebow, R. N., & Stein, J. G. (1985). Psychology and Deterrence. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Khan, Z. (2016). North Korean Nuclear Strategy: A Deterrence Quagmire for Korean Peninsula. Journal of Security and Strategic Analyses, 33-49.

Lee, B. C. (2019, October 23). Don’t be surprised when South Korea wants nuclear weapons. Retrieved from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: https://thebulletin.org/2019/10/dont-be-surprised-when-south- korea-wants-nuclear-weapons/

Lee, D. S. (2008). A nuclear North Korea and the stability of East Asia: A tsunami on the horizon? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 436- 454.

Mishra, S. (2018). The Korean Nuclear Imbroglio: Can India be a Muted Spectator? Artha- Journal of Social sciences, 17-34.

Morgan, P. M. (2003). Deterrence Now. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pandey, H. (2017, November 27). Implications of North Korean Nuclear Exchange for South Asia: Hypothetical, Reality and India’s Possible Options. Retrieved from South Asian Voices: https:// southasianvoices.org/ implications-north-korean-nuclear-exchange-south-asia-hypothetical- reality-india-options/

Pollack, J. (2012, January 23). The A.Q. Khan Network and its Fourth Customer. Retrieved from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2012/01/23/a.q.-khan- network-and-its-fourth-customer-event-3505

Quackenbush, S. L. (2011). Deterrence theory: where do we stand? Review of International Studies, 742.

Roehrig, T. (2016). North Korea, Nuclear Weapons, and the Stability- Instability Paradox. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 181-198.

Sagan, S., & Waltz, K. (2003). The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

Schelling, T. C. (1966). Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Su, B. (2020, August 7). Inferring from signaling: North Korea’s deterrence strategy and bargaining tactic. Retrieved from Nulcear Network. csis: https://nuclearnetwork.csis.org/inferring-from-signaling-north- koreas-deterrence-strategy-and-bargaining-tactic/

Vaddi, S. (2018, July 9). Singapore Summit on North Korea’s Nuclear Issue. Retrieved from Mainstream: https:// www.mainstreamweekly.net/ article8076.html

Waxman, O. B. (2018, July 26). The History Behind the Date Chosen for the Repatriation of Korean War Remains. Retrieved from Time: https://time.com/5343628/korean-war-armistice-remains/

Zagare, F. C. (2006). Deterrence is Dead. Long Live Deterrence. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 115-120.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-09