Narrativising a Department of English

Authors

  • Padmakumar M M CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru.
  • Gaana J CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru.
  • Mohan Kunjukrishna Pillai McMicken College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.38.3

Keywords:

English Studies, Higher Education, Cultural Studies, English Departments

Abstract

The Department of English in a country like India too often witnesses contestations of varied kinds. Debates range from Macaulay's prod to the madness of the method and beyond. Identity crisis - that of the department and that of its members - is one such problematic context. Sidestepping desires to sing notes of self-congratulation, this paper attempts to self-reflexively critique the values, aspirations, practices and its resultant consequences in the Department of English, Christ University, Bangalore. Such a critique will look at specific issues, concerns of, and about English Studies at Christ, based on three experience-enabled narratives. The first narrative aims at exploring 1. complexities of a fresh “pocopomo” (postcolonial-postmodern) English Studies teacher in such a reputed, metropolitan institution, 2. complexities of locating Cultural Studies within an English Studies framework in the institution, and 3. complexities of studentship in such a context.

The personal is always treated with a sense of suspicion and accompanied by a supposition that it may not be authentic. Humanities - despite the growing disrespect it faces - is one of the last bastions where the personal is not looked downupon. However, when it comes to research, even Humanities expects the shedding of the experiential and the personal, assuming that critical rigour is likely to get compromised. As the authors of this article, it is our firm belief that listening to personal experience will open doors to unexplored critical insights. We are deeply aware of the dangerous terrain we are treading in and hence we have titled it as "narrativising...", signifying the subjective takes involved. Further, the idea of giving multiple accounts coming from different standpoints (that of a new faculty, a moderately experienced faculty and a student) is to highlight the plural nature of experiences and perspectives.

Author Biographies

Padmakumar M M, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru.

Assistant Professor, Department of Media Studies, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru.

Gaana J, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru.

Assistant Professor, Department of Business Studies and Social Sciences, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru.

Mohan Kunjukrishna Pillai, McMicken College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Graduate Assistant, McMicken College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

References

Berube, M. (1998). Employment of English: Theory, Jobs, andthe Future of Literary Studies. NY: New York UP. Bhabha K. H. (2010). The Commitment to Theory. In V. B. Leitch & W. E. Cain (Eds.), The Norton anthology of theory and criticism. NY: WW Norton & Company.

Christ University. (2012). General Regulations. Retrieved from http://www.christuniversity.in/general-regulations. Dalmia, M. (1993). Derozio: English Teacher. In R. S. Rajan (Ed.), The lie of the land: English literary studies in India, Oxford: OUP. Derrida, J. (2006). Geneses, Genealogies, Genres, and Genius: The Secrets of the Archive. (Bie Brahic Beverly Trans.). NY: Columbia University Press. Dhar, A. "Cultural Studies as Labor of Negotiation in Higher Education".Cultural Studies 25 (1), 71-89. Guru, G., & Sarukkai, S. (2012). The Cracked Mirror: An Indian Debate on Experience and Theory. Delhi: Oxford. Hall, G., & Birchall, C. (2009). New Cultural Studies: Adventures in Theory. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan. Kar, P. C., Kailash, C., & Rath, S. P. (2003). Theory and praxis: Curriculum, culture and English studies. Delhi: Pencraft International. Kaul, S. (1992). The Indian Academic and Resistance to Theory. In R. S. Rajan (Ed.), The lie of the land: English literary studies in India, Oxford: OUP. Kitching, G. (2009). The Trouble with Theory: The Educational Costs of Postmodernism. New South Wales: Allen and Unwin. Mistral Movies (Producer) & Bhatia, D (Director). 2009. Nero's Guests: The Age of Inequality. DVD. Print. Natarajan, S., Joseph, N., & Srinivas, S. V. (1998). The Anatomy of a White Elephant: Notes of the Functioning of English Departments in India. In S. Tharu (ed.), Subject to Change. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.

Pillai, M. K. (2012). ―Objects in the mirror are closer than they appear‖.Witness Times. Witness Times, 20 Aug. 2011. Web. 20 Sep. 2012. Radhakrishnan, R. (2008). Cultural Studies in India: A Preliminary Report on Institutionalisation. Higher Education Cell, CSCS, Bangalore. Rajan, R. S. (Ed.). (1992). The Lie of the Land: English Literary Studies in India. Delhi: Oxford UP. Viswanathan, G. (1993). English in a literate society. In R. S. Rajan (Ed.), The lie of the land: English literary studies in India, Oxford: OUP.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-01