Making of a Celebrity: An Imagined Community Construction by Indian Press
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.21.4Keywords:
Discourse position, discourse strand, celebritisation, para-social interaction, ideological squareAbstract
With the arrival of graphic revolution, it has become increasingly impossible to draw the lines between personal and political, private and market. Television, social media and their imitative versions of newspapers have become dependent more on selling the images, literally and metaphorically to negate the pressure of public opinion in public sphere. Media as a social institution, serve the purpose of legitimizing the efforts of hegemony construction by different other social and religious institutions and in the process get involved in producing ‘metalanguage’. The efforts of media to turn everyone into celebrity enjoy the advantage of drawing public attention to farcical and construct an air of simplicity and ease. The emergence of celebrities with the help of pseudo-events in our social world has been able to foster a culture of consumption and leisure. Newspapers, supposedly a more sober and less instantaneous medium are also forced to follow the business rules set by the visual media. The intrinsic difference between a celebrity and a star happens to be one that a celebrity is in most cases incapable of becoming a star, which requires a certain amount of qualities. With the boundary between public and private closing down, the celebrities are in control of public imagination. Their existence in public life has been internalized giving birth to new kind of political discourses. The discursive elements of celebrity discourse are capable of giving birth to a new kind of ‘metalaguage’ also. The article looks into the construction of a celebrity in the pages of India’s most famous English newspapers and tries to analyze how these discursive elements are giving birth to new possibilities of a narcotizing dysfunction or collective amnesia.
References
Barthes, R. (1977). Image-Music-Text (ed. And trans. S Heath), London, Fontana.
Barthes, R. (1991). Mythologies, (trans. Annette Lavers), New York: The Noonday Press.
Boorstin, D. (1961). The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Cowen, T. (2000). What price fame? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dyer, R. (1979). Stars. London: British Film Institute.
Evans, J. & Hesmondhalgh, D. (2005) Understanding media: Inside celebrity. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
Foucault, M. (1979). The History of Sexuality, Vol.1: An Introduction (trans. R. Hurley), London: Allen Lane.
Garrat, S. (2002). Idols made in our own image. The Observer, 3 February, p. 16, in Evans, J. and Hesmondhalgh, D. (Eds) Understanding media: inside celebrity, 2005, Berkshire: Open University Press.
Gray, J. (2002). Ulrika is a sign that we‟ve got it all. New Statesman, 28 October, pp-28-30, in Evans, J. and Hesmondhalgh, D. (Eds) Understanding Media: Inside Celebrity, (2005) 2005,Berkshire: Open University Press.
Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/Decoding. In Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A. and Willis, P.(eds) Culture, media, language, London, Hutchinson
Horton, D. & Wohl, R. R. (2004). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance (first published 1956), in J. D. Peters and P. Simpson (eds) Mass communication and american social thought: Key texts, 1919-1968, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littelefield.
Laughey, D. (2007). Key themes in media theory, Berkshire: Open University Press.
Marshall, P.D. (1997). Celebrity and power: Fame in contemporary culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of Place, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis, London: Continuum.
Rogers, R. (2004). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach, London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008a). Discourse and context. A sociocognitive approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How context controls texts and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Artha - Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
