After English: What do we Teach when we Teach Literary and Cultural Studies?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.50.1Keywords:
Capabilities and English Studies, Pedagogy, Close Reading in LiteratureAbstract
English Literature today is very different from what it was in the early 1990s, when the discipline was called upon to justify its existence by a vocal section of teachers and students. As a result of the changes inaugurated by the crisis in English Studies‘ and due to the comfort afforded by the demand for English language, the discipline has been relatively free from internal and external pressures to justify its existence. This is, therefore, a good time to raise the question of disciplinary relevance. I draw on my experience as a student, teacher and researcher formed by the 1990s to argue that the transformation of the discipline was at least partly facilitated by its investment in the engagement with texts and texutality. Reading and interpretation, albeit framed by a very different set of concerns, remain at the heart of Literary Studies as well as its offshoot, Cultural Studies. I, therefore, suggest that we consciously focus on building this capability, even as we introduce our students to an every-expanding range of textual forms.
References
Best, S., & Marcus, S. (2009). Surface reading: An introduction. Representations, 108(1), 1-21.
Das, V. (1981). The mythological film and its framework of meaning: An analysis of "Jai Santoshi Ma". India International Centre Quarterly, 8(1), 43-56.
Das, V. (1988). Science and violence in popular fiction: four novels of Ira Levin. In A. Nandy (Ed.) Science, hegemony and violence: A requiem for modernity. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, (211-231).
Gupta, C. D. (1991). The painted face: Studies in India's popular cinema. Roli Books.
Dickey, S. (1993). Cinema and the urban poor in South India. Cambridge University Press.
Dyer, R. (2003). A star is born and the construction of authenticity. Stardom, (155-163). Routledge.
Guha, R. (1983a). The prose of counter-insurgency. In R. Guha (Ed.) Subaltern studies II: writings on South Asian History and Society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
__. 1983b. Elementary aspects of peasant insurgency in colonial India. Delhi: New Oxford University Press.
Hansen, M. (1991). Babel and Babylon: spectatorship in American silent film. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Hardgrave, R. L. (1973). Politics and the film in Tamil Nadu: The stars and the DMK. Asian Survey, 13(3), (288-305).
——. (1979). When stars displace the gods: The folk culture of cinemain Tamil Nadu. In Essays in the Political Sociology of South India. New Delhi: Manohar.
Jenkins, H. (2012). Textual poachers: television fans and participatory culture. Routledge.
Kumar, Udaya. (2019). Reading and cultural studies turn. Paper presented at the National Symposium on Rethinking English Studies in India: The Cultural Studies Turn and Its Possibilities. School of Business Studies and Social Sciences, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru, 14th February.
Lewis, L. A. (2002). The adoring audience: fan culture and popular media. Routledge.
Mankekar, P. (1999). Screening culture, viewing politics: An ethnography of television, womanhood, and nation in postcolonial India. Duke University Press.
Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. Verso Books.
Natarajan, S., Nigel J. & Srinivas, S.V. (1991). The anatomy of a white elephant: notes on the functioning of English departments of India, Journal of English and Foreign Languages, 7 & 8 (June and December).
Niranjana, T. (1990). 'History, really beginning': compulsions of post-colonial pedagogy. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(42/43), 2379-2384.
___. (1991). Cinema, femininity and economy of consumption. Economic and Political Weekly, 26(43), WS85-WS86.
___. (1994). Integrating whose nation? Tourists and terrorists in Roja. Economic and Political Weekly. 29(3), 79-82.
Pandian, M. S. S. (1991). Parasakthi: Life and times of a DMK film. Economic and Political Weekly, 759-770.
———. (1992). The image trap: M.G. Ramachandran in the film and politics. Delhi: Newbury Park, London: Sage.
Pappu, R. (2005). English studies in India: critical moments. In S. Poduval (Ed.), Re-figuring culture: history, theory and the aesthetic in contemporary India. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, 17-55.
Prasad, M. M. (1998). Ideology of the Hindi film: A historical construction. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
___. (2005). Teaching capitalism as a native language. In S. Poduval (Ed.), Re-figuring culture: history, theory and the aesthetic in contemporary India. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, 56-67.
Rajadhyaksha, A. (2000). Viewership and democracy in the cinema. In R. S. Vasudevan (Ed.), Making meaning in Indian cinema. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 267–96.
Srinivas, S.V. (1997). Fans and stars: production, reception and circulation of the moving image. PhD Dissertation submitted to the Department of English, University of Hyderabad.
___. (2009). Megastars: Chiranjeevi and Telugu cinema after N.T. Rama Rao. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Vermorel, F., & Vermorel J. (1985). Starlust: The secret fantasies of fans. London W.H. Allen. Viswanathan, G. (1990). Masks of conquest: literary study and British rule in India. London: Faber and Faber.
WaThiong'o, N. (1992). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. East African Publishers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Artha - Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
