Covid-19, Risk and the Global Society of Mask

Authors

  • Rebwar Karimi CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.59.1

Keywords:

Covid-19, Pandemic, Risk, Risk Society, Trust, Nation-State, Abstract Systems

Abstract

Proximity has become our Achilles heel. We live in a global, tightly networked world whose keyword is "safety gap"! Individuals, families, communities, cities, states, and countries will keep their distance from each other. The use of masks has become a kind of metaphor to depict a wide range of hazards and our human insecurity in the middle of this global chaos. Not in vain: a loss of 3 million human lives and 30 trillion USD financial loss only in 2020 is merely part of the Covid-19 pandemic cost calculation. We face the most fundamental questions of sociology: Trust, which is the cornerstone of our social life, is threatened. The epidemic has roots in human lifestyles and choices as well as in decision-making. Thus, the concepts of risk and risk society have become more relevant. This paper discusses this reality against the risk society literature background and utilizes facts related to the pandemic in a global sphere. The purpose is to perceive how a global risk society is formed around the pandemic and how normative choices, reasonable measures, and expert solutions will lead to an additional sense of insecurity. The content analysis method is applied to this research. The theoretical discussion of the study is supported by material consisting of online press material, expert comments, interviews, video, etc. Research shows that with the pandemic, the function of modern institutions in societies has become both emphasized and criticized. Also, confidence in the expert system has been on a collision course. In parallel, these processes have increased uncertainty, which contributes to improving social reflexivity in the face of global challenges.

Author Biography

Rebwar Karimi, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru.

Department of Sociology and Social Work, School of Social Sciences, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Hosur Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

References

Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics (Vol. 34). Oxford: Blackwell.

Bauman, Z., &Vainonen, J. (2000). Sosiologinen ajattelu. 7. painos. Suomentanut Vainonen,

Jyrki. Vastapaino: Tampere.

Bauman, Z., & May, T. (2019). Thinking sociologically. John Wiley & Sons.

Beck, Ulrich. (2009). World at risk. Polity.

Beck, Ulrich (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.London:Sage.

Beck, U., &Lempa, H. (1990). Riskiyhteiskunnan vastamyrkyt: organisoitu vastuuttomuus. Vastapaino.

Beck, Ulrich. (1987). The anthropological shock: Chernobyl and the contours of the risk society. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 153-165.

Bloomberg News. (2020, 25 May). China's 'Bat Woman' Warns Coronavirus Is Just Tip of the Iceberg. Bloomberg. Retrievedhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-25/china-s-bat-woman-warns-coronavirus-is-just-tip-of-the-iceberg.

Doucleff, M. (2021). WHO Points to Wildlife Farms in Southern China as Likely Source of Pandemic. NPR.

Fahimi, Mehdi. (2021). Magnetization of the body after the corona vaccine. [video]. Aparat. Retrieved https://www.aparat.com/v/cswWU/

Giddens, A. (2004). Sociology. John Wiley & Sons.

Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right: The future of radical politics. Stanford University Press.

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Polity Press.

Harari, Y. N. (2020). The world after coronavirus. Financial Times, 20(03), 2020.

Iltalehti. (2020, 17 Nov). Retrievedhttps://www.iltalehti.fi/ulkomaat/a/df8d1652-7f6b-47e6-80c7-d7eb6173f6ed.

Jokinen, P. (2008). Riskiyhteiskunta nyt? Neljännesvuosisata Beckin aikalaisdiagnoosia. Futura 27 (2008): 4.

Kainulainen, S. (2000). Sosiaalinen turvallisuus ja yhteiskunnan rakenne. In Niemelä, P. & Lahikainen, A.(Eds.) Inhimillinen turvallisuus. Tampere: Vastapaino, 287-303.

Kamppinen, M., Raivola, P., Jokinen, P., & Karlsson, H. (1995). Riskit yhteiskunnassa: maallikot ja asiantuntijat päätösten tekijöinä. Gaudeamus, Tampere.

Kemshall, H. (2002). Risk, social policy and welfare. Open University Press. Buckingham, Philadelphia.

Korpiola, L., & Poutanen, P. (2021). Korona ja digitaalinen riskiyhteiskunta. Werner Söderström Ltd.

Lahti, Vesa-Matti. (2020, 09 Nov). Korona toi riskiyhteiskunta-ajattelun takaisin. SITRA. Retrievedhttps://www.sitra.fi/blogit/korona-toi-riskiyhteiskunta-ajattelun-takaisin/

Lahti, V. M. (1998). Riskiyhteiskunta vesilasissa. Yliopistopaino.

Niemelä، A.& Lahikainen, R. (2000). Inhimillinen turvallisuus. Vastapaino: Tampere.

Pilkington, E. (2020). Black Americans dying of Covid-19 at three times the rate of white people. The Guardian, 20.

Slovic, P. (1994). Perceptions of risk: Paradox and challenge. In Future risks and risk management (pp. 63-78). Springer, Dordrecht.

Vornanen, R. (2000). Teknologiset riskit ja turvallisuus. In Niemelä, P. & Lahikainen, AR (Eds.)Inhimillinenturvallisuus. Vastapaino, Tampere, 321-344.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-01