Social Divisions among the Indian Labouring Masses
Keywords:Capitalism, Social Exclusion, Continuity, Change, Globalisation, Privatisation, Liberalisation, Cultural Intimacy
Dalits and women in India are denied even minimum representation in policy making and accessing national resources. Highly under-represented in state machinery, media, and all higher wage employments, they are highly over-represented in low wage, highly labour intensive, and hazardous jobs. For them, facing exploitation and discrimination, not only by the state and the employers but also by their fellow workers, is a constant reality. The social, cultural, economic, and political systems in India are built to operate in such a way as to produce and reproduce the social divisions continuously and aggravate the problems of divisions among the labourers. The labour movements, which are supposed to oppose this unjust system, have generally ignored the issue of representation of dalits and women as they operate as part and parcel of the same social system that produces and reproduces ascriptive divisiveness.
Bhaduri, Amit. (2022). A New Path to Minimum Support Price. https://www.ecotalker.wordpress.com, January 12.
Chakrabarty, Tania. et al. (2014). Growth Regime, Labour Market and Inequality in India in Historical Perspective. IHD-Cebrap Project on Labour Market Inequality in Brazil and India. August 11.
GoI. (2001). National Policy for the Empowerment of Women. Ministry of Women and Child Development. Government of India.
GoI. (2005-06). Annual Report. Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions. Government of India.
GoI. (2006). Employment and Unemployment Situation among Social Groups in India 2004-05. NSS 61st Round. National Sample Survey Organisation. Government of India. October.
GoI. (2009). Committee on State Agrarian Relations and Unfinished Task of Land Reforms. Ministry of Rural Development. Government of India. New Delhi.
Herzfeld, Michael. (2016). Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics and the Real Life of States, Societies, and Institutions. Routledge.
Jodhka, Surinder S. (2015). Ascriptive Hierarchies: Caste and Its Reproduction in Contemporary India. Current Sociology. December.
Kapur, Devesh and Ramamurti, Ravi. (2002). Privatization in India: The Imperatives and Consequences of Gradualism. Working Paper No. 142. Centre for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform. Stanford University. Stanford.
NIPCCD. (2010). Statistics on Women in India. National Institute of Public Cooperation and Child Development.
Pratap, Surendra. (2011). Aggravating Problems of Social Exclusion and Challenges Before the Labour Movement. Centre for Workers Education, New Delhi. Working Paper.
Robinson, Victoria. (Undated). Towards a New Enlightenment? A Transcendental Decade: Gender Inequality: Past Issues and Future Possibilities. University of York. Open Mind.
Teltumbde, Anand. (1996). Impact of Economic Reforms on Dalits in India. Paper presented in the Seminar at the University of Oxford. UK. November 8.
Thorat, Sukhadeo. (2004). On Reservation Policy for Private Sector. Economic and Political Weekly, 39 (25). June 19.
The Hindu BusinessLine. (2004). June 12.
The Hindustan Times. (2006). June 4.
Copyright (c) 2022 Artha Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.