Indian Courts and Social Change: A Case Study of the Doctrine of Informed Consent in Medical Law and Ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.23.3Keywords:
Doctrine of informed consent, Social change, Courts in India, Bodily autonomy, Law and ethics introductionAbstract
The doctrine of informed consent in medical law andethics has a strong grounding in the principle of bodilyautonomy and self-determination of human beings. Thisemphasis on the freedom of every individual to decidewhat is best for his/her body and health has led to severalcontroversies in the area of medical law and ethics inIndia and abroad, especially in the United Kingdom.Being a legal and ethical doctrine, „informed consent‟ hasbeen discarded, accepted, modified and emulated byvarious judgments of courts. This paper will examine theingenuity of courts in bringing about social change byupholding patient autonomy and adopting the doctrine ofinformed consent in the UK. However, this doctrine hasbeen rejected by the Indian Supreme Court, citing thereason that Indian citizens are unprepared and illequippedto understand the complexities of medicaltreatment and procedures. This view, in the author‟sopinion, is a missed opportunity for the Indian SupremeCourt to bring about social change by upholding patientrights and autonomy.
References
Achutrao Haribhau Khodwa and Others v State of Maharashtra and Others, (1996) 2 SCC 634 (Supreme Court of India 1996).
Airedale NHS Trust v Bland, [1993] AC 789 (House of Lords 1993).
Birch v University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, [2008] EWHC 2237 (Court of Appeal 2008).
Blyth v Bloomsbury Health Authority, [1993] 4 MedLR 151 (Court of Appeal 1993).
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee, [1957] 1 WLR 582 (House of Lords 1957).
Brazier, M. (1987). Patient autonomy and consent to treatment: The role of the law? Journal of Legal Studies, 7, 169-193.
Cane, P., & Conaghan, J. (Eds.). (2008). The new Oxford companion to law. 202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chester v Afshar, [2005] 1 AC 134 (House of Lords 2004).
Code of Ethics Regulations, 2002. (2010). Retrieved August 19, 2012, from Medical Council of India: http://www.mciindia.org/RulesandRegulations/CodeofMedicalEthicsRegulations2002.aspx
Dr. A. K. Mittal & Anr V. Rajkumar & Anr, 2009 Indlaw NCDRC 37 (National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 2009).
Eyal, N. (2012). Informed Consent. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/informed-consent/
Francis Q. C. R., & Johnstone, C. (2001). Medical Treatment: Decisions and the Law. Butterworths.
Gold v Haringey Health Authority, [1988] QB 481 (Court of Appeal 1988).
Grubb, A., Liang, J., & McHale, J. (2010). Principles of medical law, Oxford University Press.
Grubb, A., Liang, J., & McHale, J. (2010). Principles of medical law. Oxford University Press.
H. S. Tuli v Post Graduate Institute of Medical and Others, 2008 Indlaw NCDRC 58 (National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 2008).
ICMR Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Reseach on Human Participants, 2006. (n.d.). Retrieved August 20, 2012, from Indian Council for Medical Research: http"//icmr.nic.in/ethical_guidelines.pdf
Indian Medical Association v V. P. Shantha and Others, (1995) 6 SCC 651 (Supreme Court of India 1995).
Jackson, E. (2010). Medical law: Text, cases and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, M. (1999). Informed consent and other fairy stories. Medical Law Review, 7, 103.
Kennedy, I. (1986). The Fiduciary Relationship and its Application to Doctors. In P. Birks (Ed.), Wrongs and remedies in the twenty-first century (p. 138). Clarendon Press.
Kennedy, I. (n.d.).
Lewis, C. (2006). Clinical negligence: A practical guide (6th ed.). Tottel Publishing.
Manson, N., & O'Neill, O. (2007). Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin F. D'Souza v Mohd. Ishfaq, (2009) 3 SCC 1 (Supreme Court of India 2009).
Miola, J. (2007). Medical ethics and medical law: A symbiotic relationship. Portland: Hart Publishing.
O'Neill, O. (2003). Symposium on consent and confidentiality: Some limits of informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(1), 4-7.
Pattinson, S. (2006). Medical law and ethics (1st ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Pawan Anand and another v Director General of Health Services and others, 2012 Indlaw Del 1360 (Delhi High Court 2012).
Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust, [1999] PIQR 53 (1999).
Re F (Mental Patient: Sterlization), [1990] 2 AC 1 (House of Lords).
Samira Kohli v Dr. Prabha Manchanda, (2008) 2 SCC 1 (Supreme Court of India 2008).
Saroj Chandoke and others v Sri Ganga Hospital and others, 2007 Indlaw NCDRC 46 (National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 2007).
Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital, (1914) 211 NY 125 (New York Court of Appeals 1914).
Schuck, P. H. (1994). Rethinking informed consent. Yale Law Journal, 103, 906.
Schuck, P. H. (1994). Rethinking informed consent. Yale Law Journal, 103, 903.
Schuck, P. H. (1994). Rethinking informed consent. Yale Law Journal, 103, 903.
Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital and others, [1985] AC 871 (House of Lords 1985).
Smith v Tunbridge Wells Health Authority, [1994] 5 MedLR 334 (Court of Appeal 1994).
Smt. Vinitha Ashok v Lakshmi Hospital and others, (2001) 8 SCC 731 (Supreme Court of India 2001).
Stauch, M. (2005). Causation and confusion in respect of medical non-disclosure: Chester v. Afshar. Nottingham Law Journal, 14, 66.
Stauch, M., Wheat, K., & Tingle, J. (2006). Text, cases and materials on medical law (3rd ed.). Routledge Cavendish.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Artha - Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
