Assessing the Relationship between Councilors, Traditional Leaders and Society in Local Governance in Ubuhlebezwe Local Municipality

Authors

  • Clifford Mhlanyukwa Duma Duma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.71.1

Keywords:

Councilors, Traditional leaders, Service delivery, Society in local governance

Abstract

South Africa, with its heterogeneous population, aims to promote the engagement of all citizens in governance. Section 81 of the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act (Act No. 117 of 1998) enables traditional leaders to participate in municipal councils. There has been insufficient research and established models of best practices for implementing Section 81 since the national Act was passed. Sections 152(b) and 153(a) of the 1996 Constitution outline the authorised powers of local government. These sections state that one of the objectives of local government, under council members' leadership, is to ensure sustainable services to the public. Additionally, local government is responsible for organising and overseeing the municipality's budgetary, planning, and administrative processes, particularly prioritising the needs of vulnerable citizens. Consequently, ward council members were elected in the rural districts under the jurisdiction of traditional authorities. The rights and responsibilities of elected council members are specified in Section 156 of the Constitution. The Constitution does not provide a clear definition for the role of traditional leaders, who are responsible for managing extensive areas of land and receiving compensation from the government for their role in preserving culture and customs. Hence, this research analyses the correlation between council members, traditional leaders, and society in governance to ascertain compliance with section 152 (1) of the Constitution, 1996. Additionally, it explores the possibility of formulating a constitution and a code of conduct for traditional chiefs and council members, enabling citizens to lodge complaints against the activities of these two officials if required.

References

Axelrod, R., (2000). ‘On six advances in cooperation theory’, Analyse & Kritik 22: 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2000-0107.

Düsing, S. (2002). Traditional leadership and democratisation in Southern Africa: A comparative study of Botswana, Namibia, and Southern Africa (Vol. 6). LIT Verlag Münster.

Fox, W., & Wissink, H. (1990). Macro-organisation of public institutions. University Publishers & Booksellers.

Knoetze, E. (2014). ‘Legislative regulation of the developmental functions of traditional leadership in conflict or cohesion with municipal councils?’, Speculum Juris 28: 161–195.

Mashau, T.S., Mutshaeni, H.N. & Kone, L.R. (2014). ‘The relationship between traditional leaders and rural local municipalities in South Africa: With special reference to legislations governing local government’, Studies of Tribes and Tribals 12: 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972639X.2014.11886702

Mawere, J., Matshidze, P.E., Kugara, S.L. & Madzivhandila, T. (2022). ‘The role and significance of traditional leadership in South African local governance’, in R. Tshifhumulo & T. Makhanikhe (eds.), Handbook of research on protecting and managing global indigenous knowledge systems, pp. 249–273, IGI Global.

Namibia (2000). The Traditional Authorities Act, 2000 (Act 25 of 2000),

Namibia Government Guzetti: Promulgation of Traditional Authorities Act, 1995 (Act, 17 of 1995), of the Parliament.

Namibia. (1998). Constitution of the Republic of Namibia Act, 1998 (Act of 1998). Windhoek: Government Printers.

Nekhavhambe, M.M. (2014). ‘The role of municipal councillors and traditional leaders in service delivery: The case of Thulumela Local Municipality’, Journal of Public Administration 49:1139-1152.

Ray, D. I., & Reddy, P. S. (2003). Grassroots Governance? Chiefs in Africa and the Afro-Caribbean (p. 322). University of Calgary Press.

Reddy, P.S. (1999). Local Government Democratisation and Decentralisation. Cape Town: Juta & Co. LTD.

Rugege, S. (1998). The Institution of Traditional Leadership & Its Relation with Elected Local Government. Pretoria: Human Science Research Publishers.

Rugege, S. (2002). Traditional Leadership and Its Future Role in Local Governance. Constitution and Law IV: Colloquium on Local Government Seminar Report, No. 14. Johannesburg: Konrad Adenauer-Stiftung. Sindane, J. 1994.

Rugege, S. (2003). Traditional leadership and its future role in local governance. Law, Democracy & Development, 7: pp. 171–200.

Sacchetti, S., & Catturani, I. (2017). The institutions of governance. A framework for analysis.

South Africa. (1927). Black Administration Act, 1927 (Act 38 of 1927). Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (1957). Black Authorities Act, 1957 (Act no 110 of 1957). Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (1998). Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act 117 of 1998) as amended. Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (1998). White Paper on Local Government. Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (2000). A Draft Discussion Document Towards a White Paper on Traditional Leadership and Institutions. Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (2000). Local Government: Municipal System Act, 2000 (Act 32 of 2000). Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (2002). A Draft White Paper on Traditional Leaders. Pretoria Government Printers.

The Black Administration Act 1927 (Act 110 of 1927).

The National House of Traditional Leaders in South Africa, the Council of Chiefs (Draft White Paper on Traditional Leadership and Governance 2002).

The Republic of South Africa’s Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act, 2003 (Act 41 of 2003) Chapter 7.

Tshitangoni, M. & Francis, J. (2018). ‘Relevance of traditional leadership in rural community development amidst democratic institutions in Southern Africa: A critical review’, Studies of Tribes and Tribals 15: 70-83. https://doi.org/10.108 0/0972639X.2017.1383557

Zuma, B. (2010). The social psychology of (de) segregation. Rigorously studied and poorly conceptualised. Psychology & Society, 3: pp. 92–106.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20