A Study on the Anti-Takeover Defence Strategies Used by the Corporates at the Time of Mergers & Acquisitions

Authors

  • Suman Mishra Education
  • Priya Thenissery
  • Punith Raj N
  • Abhishek R

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12725/ujbm.62.4

Keywords:

mergers, acquisitions, antitake over, strategies

Abstract

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have become a common strategy for companies looking to grow and expand their operations. However, the potential benefits of M&A can also attract unwanted attention from potential acquirers, which can lead to hostile takeover attempts. To protect themselves from hostile takeovers, companies often implement anti-takeover defense strategies. Anti-takeover defense strategies refer to a range of defensive tactics that target companies can employ to deter or prevent hostile takeovers. These strategies can take various forms, including structural defenses, governance defenses, and financial defenses.

This research paper examines anti-takeover defense strategies in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) using secondary data sources. The paper provides an overview of the various types of anti-takeover defense strategies that are commonly used by companies, including structural, governance, and financial defenses. The paper also analyzes the various anti-takeover defense strategies adopted in protecting shareholder value and limiting competition. The regulatory frameworks governing anti-takeover defense strategies in different jurisdictions are also explored, including the United States, United Kingdom, European Union, and Japan.

The findings of this study indicate that the use of anti-takeover defense strategies can be effective in protecting shareholder value, but may also limit competition and potentially result in lower acquisition premiums. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for companies involved in M&A transactions, and the need to balance the protection of shareholder interests with the potential benefits of being an attractive target for acquisition.

Overall, this research provides a comprehensive analysis of the complex landscape of anti-takeover defense strategies in M&A transactions, based on secondary data sources. The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of the role of anti-takeover defense strategies in M&A transactions and the considerations that must be taken into account by companies when implementing these strategies.

References

Singh, A. (2018). Anti-takeover defense strategies: a review of literature. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(2), 156-176.

Kuo, J., & Lin, J. (2017). The impact of anti-takeover defense mechanisms on firm value: Evidence from the Taiwan stock market. International Review of Economics & Finance, 50, 207-222.

Hazarika, N., & Bhattacharyya, A. K. (2018). Anti-takeover defense strategies and firm performance: A study of Indian firms. Journal of Economics and Business, 96, 54-69.

Mishra, S. K., & Jha, S. (2019). Anti-takeover defense strategies and firm value: Evidence from India. The Journal of Applied Management Research, 1(1), 34-48.

Mahadeo, J. D., & Soobaroyen, T. (2018). Anti-takeover defense strategies and firm performance: Evidence from Mauritius. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(4), 455-472.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-23

How to Cite

Mishra, S., Thenissery, P., N, P. R., & R, A. (2023). A Study on the Anti-Takeover Defence Strategies Used by the Corporates at the Time of Mergers & Acquisitions. Ushus Journal of Business Management, 22(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.12725/ujbm.62.4