Vol. 21 No. 4 (2022): Mapana Journal of Sciences
Research Articles

Optoelectronic Transitions in Gold Spherical Nanoparticles - A Simulation Study

PDF
  • Amit Kumar
Amit Kumar
Bhaskaracharya College of Applied Sciences, Delhi.
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12723/mjs.63.5

Published 2022-12-06

Keywords

  • electric field variations,
  • extinction coefficient,
  • embedded medium dependences,
  • Gold nanoparticles,
  • Material Science,
  • Nano Particles
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2022

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study examined extinction spectra, electric field intensity, and their variations due to various semiconductor medium, for gold nanoparticles, using Nanosphere Optics Lab Field Simulator which is based on Mie’s theory of scattering by sphere. The peak extinction wavelength and bandwidth are found to get varied with size of the gold nanoparticle, in four different regimes. Asymmetric distributions of electric fields are observed in particles typically larger than 25nm. The significant differences are found in the results due to changes in the embedding medium. The gold nanoparticles' unique tunable electro-optical properties may therefore be useful for medical, health care, industrial catalysts, and other consumer products. The study shows improved results may be obtained in the medium size range i.e. 25-75nm. In addition, the selectivity can be improved linearly as the refractive index of the host material increases.

PDF

References

  1. S. S. Salem, A. Fouda, Biol Trace Elem Res 199, 344–370 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02138-3
  2. S. Sreelakshmi, P.K. Vineeth, A. Mohanan, and N.V. Ramesh, Materials Today: Proceedings, 46(8), 3079-3083, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.585
  3. Z. Huaizhi, N. Yuantao, Gold Bull 34, 24–29 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03214805
  4. D. Pal, C. K. Sahu, A. Haldar, J. Adv. Pharma. Tech. & Res. 5(1), 4 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.%20126980
  5. T. Patil-Bhole, A. Wele, R. Gudi, K. Thakur, S. Nadkarni, R. Panmand, B. Kale, J. Ayur. Inte. Medi., 12(4), 640–648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2021.06.017
  6. W. Paul, C. P. Sharma. Int J Ayur. Res. 2(1):14-22 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7788.83183
  7. K. Khoshnevisan, M. Daneshpour, M. Barkhi, M. Gholami, H. Samadian and H. Maleki, J.Drug Targeting, 26(7), 525-532 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2017.1387790
  8. D. Aleksa, et al. ACS Nano 14(12) 17597-17605 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c08431
  9. K. V. Pereira, R. Giacomeli, M. G. de Gomes, S. E. Haas, Placenta, 100, 75, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2020.08.005
  10. P. Slepicka, N. S. Kasálková, J. Siegel, Z. Kolská and V. Švorcík, Materials, 13(1), 1, (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010001
  11. B. Tejerina, T. Takeshita, L. Ausman and G. C. Schatz, "Nanosphere Optics Lab Field Simulator," Nano hub, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4231/D3FF3M064
  12. E. G. Wrigglesworth, J. H. Johnston. Nanoscale Advances, 3(12), 3530-3536 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NA00148E
  13. A. F. Najafabadi, B. Auguié. Materials Advances, 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1MA00869B
  14. A. Kumar, J. Adv. Sci. Res., 12 (ICITNAS), 223-229 (2021).
  15. K. L. Kelly, E. Coronado, L. L. Zhao and G. C. Schatz, J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 668, (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp026731y
  16. Y. Huang, L. Ma, M. Hou, J. Li, Z. Xie and Z. Zhang, Scientific Reports, 6, 30011 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30011
  17. S. Kaushal, S. S. Nanda, S. Samal, and D. Kee Yi, ChemBioChem, 21(5), 576, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201900566
  18. H. Huang and Leonid V. Zhigilei, J. Phy. Chem. C, 125(24), 13413, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03146
  19. S. Altowyan, A. M. Mostafa and H. A. Ahmed, Optik, 241, 167217 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167217