Analysing Research Trends in the Indian Hospitality and Tourism Sector: A Bibliometric Analysis for the Period 2000-21
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12727/ajts.28.2Keywords:
Bibliometric Analysis, Hospitality, Tourism, Articles, Trends, CitationsAbstract
The purpose of the study was to have an overview of the popular themes studied by Indian researchers from 2000 to 2021. The paper helped to identify the trends and development in the research area in the context of the Indian hospitality and tourism sector. The study selected 1821 research papers of Indian origin from the Scopus database published in 22 years (2000-2021). The selected publications were analysed using different bibliometric methods of analysis using biblioshiny and VOS viewer within the scope of several parameters. The entire period was divided into three distinct timeframes to study the research trends during that time frame. The maximum number of articles have been published in recent years, i.e., 2020, while the minimum number of article publications was observed in 2001. 1241 citations were received in 2019 and received only 110 citations were seen in 2005. "Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes" and "International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management" have been reported to be the most productive journals. At the same time, 'Singh S.' is the most effective author with a maximum number of articles, while 'Jauhari V' has the most citations for the work. Sustainability and Conservation are the themes of common interest irrespective of timeframe, while the role of social media, covid 19, are recent trending topics for researchers. Despite contributing significantly to the hospitality and tourism literature in the Indian context, the study has a few limitations. The present study did not include publications other than articles like conference proceedings, book chapters, dissertations, etc. Selection of tools used and the keywords chosen for the study also limit the outcome. The findings of the analysis are helpful in better understanding the direction of research themes in the hotel and tourism sector. Evaluation of prominent authors and their work helps to focus on the trending themes in the sector among researchers. Additionally, it aids future researchers in determining the trends in the hospitality and tourism sector. To the best of the author’s knowledge, the sample used for this study was the most extensive group of publications published in India’s hospitality and tourism sector. By outlining the current research orientations and trends in hospitality and tourism, this study significantly contributes to the existing literature.
References
Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9(1)
Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2), 343-351. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0582-8
Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y
Benckendorff, P., & Zehrer, A. (2013).A network analysis of tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 43, 121-149.
Correia, A., & Kozak, M. (2021). Past, present and future: trends in tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism, 1-16. doi:10.1080/13683500.2021.1918069
Evren, S., & Kozak, N. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of tourism and hospitality related articles published in Turkey. Anatolia, 25(1), 61-80.
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. Faseb j, 22(2), 338-342. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
Guzeller, C. O., & Celiker, N. (2019).Bibliometrical analysis of Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(1), 108-120. doi:10.1080/10941665.2018.1541182
Hicks, D. (2004). The Four Literatures of Social Science.
Houshyar, M., & Sotudeh, H. (2018). A Reflection on the Applicability of Google Scholar as a Tool for Comprehensive Retrieval in Bibliometric Research and Systematic Reviews. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 16, 1-17.
Jacsó, P. (2005). Google Scholar: the pros and the cons. Online Information Review, 29(2), 208-214. doi:10.1108/14684520510598066
Jacso, P. (2008). Google Scholar revisited. Online Information Review, 32, 102-114. doi:10.1108/14684520810866010
Koseoglu, M. A., Rahimi, R., Okumus, F., & Liu, J. J. A. o. T. R. (2016). Bibliometric studies in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 61, 180-198.
Köseoglu, M. A., Sehitoglu, Y., Ross, G., & Parnell, J. A. (2016). The evolution of business ethics research in the realm of tourism and hospitality: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Kumar, S., Sureka, R., & Vashishtha, A. (2020). The Journal of Heritage Tourism: a bibliometric overview since its inception. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 15(4), 365-380. doi:10.1080/1743873X.2020.1754423
Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Tan, G. W.-H., Ooi, K.-B., & Lee, V.-H. (2021). Tourism research progress – a bibliometric analysis of tourism review publications. Tourism Review, 76(1), 1-26. doi:10.1108/TR-11-2019-0449
Martínez-López, F. J., Merigó, J. M., Valenzuela-Fernández, L., & Nicolás, C. (2018). Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: a bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1/2), 439-468. doi:10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0853
Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. J. A. A. R. (2017).Accounting research: A bibliometric analysis. 27(1), 71-100.
Merigó, J. M., Mulet-Forteza, C., Martorell, O., & Merigó-Lindahl, C. (2020). Scientific research in the tourism, leisure and hospitality field: a bibliometric analysis. Anatolia, 31(3), 494-508. doi:10.1080/13032917.2020.1771602
Merigó, J. M., Mulet-Forteza, C., Valencia, C., & Lew, A. A. (2019). Twenty years of Tourism Geographies: a bibliometric overview. Tourism Geographies, 21(5), 881-910. doi:10.1080/14616688.2019.1666913
Mulet-Forteza, C., Genovart-Balaguer, J., Mauleon-Mendez, E., & Merigó, J. M. (2019).A bibliometric research in the tourism, leisure and hospitality fields. Journal of Business Research, 101, 819-827. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.002
Mulet-Forteza, C., Martorell-Cunill, O., Merigó, J. M., Genovart-Balaguer, J., & Mauleon-Mendez, E. (2018). Twenty five years of the Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing: a bibliometric ranking. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(9), 1201-1221. doi:10.1080/10548408.2018.1487368
Norris, Michael, & Charles Oppenheim. 2007. Comparing Alternatives to theWeb of Science for Coverage of the Social Sciences’ Literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2): 161–169. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001.
Nusair, K., Butt, I., & Nikhashemi, S. R. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of social media in hospitality and tourism research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Okumus, B., Koseoglu, M. A., & Ma, F. (2018). Food and gastronomy research in tourism and hospitality: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 73, 64-74.
Palácios, H., de Almeida, M. H., & Sousa, M. J. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of trust in the field of hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95, 102944.
Pritchard, A. J. J. o.d.(1969).Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. 25(4), 348-349.
Qian, J., Law, R., Wei, J., & Wu, Y. (2019). Trends in Global Tourism Studies: A Content Analysis of the Publications in Tourism Management. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 20(6), 753-768. doi:10.1080/1528008X.2019.1658149
Sainaghi, R., & Baggio, R. J. I. J. o. H. M. (2020). Clusters of topics and research designs in peer-to-peer accommodation platforms. 88, 102393.
Sánchez, A. D., de la Cruz Del Río Rama, M., & García, J. Á. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases Scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 8-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.02.001
SCIMAGO. (2021). SCImago Journal Ranking. https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=1409
Sharma, P., Singh, R., Tamang, M., Singh, A. K., & Singh, A. K. (2021). Journal of teaching in travel & tourism: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 21(2), 155-176. doi:10.1080/15313220.2020.1845283
Singh, R., Sibi, P. S., & Sharma, P. (2021). Journal of ecotourism: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Ecotourism, 1-17. doi:10.1080/14724049.2021.1916509
Singh, R., Sibi, P. S., Sharma, P., Tamang, M., & Singh, A. K. (2021). Twenty Years of Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism: A Bibliometric Assessment. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 1-26. doi:10.1080/1528008X.2021.1884931
Svensson, G. (2010). SSCI and its impact factors: a “prisoner's dilemma”? European Journal of Marketing, 44(1/2), 23-33. doi:10.1108/03090561011008583
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014).Visualising bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285-320): Springer.
Wijesignhe, S. N. R., Mura, P., & Bouchon, F. (2019). Tourism knowledge and neocolonialism –A systematic critical review of the literature. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(11), 1263–1279.
WTTC. (2020). Economic Impact Reports, World Travel & Tourism Council: https://wttc.org/Research/Economic-Impact
Ye, Q., Song, H., & Li, T. (2012). Cross-institutional collaboration networks in tourism and hospitality research. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2-3, 55-64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2012.03.002
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. J. O. r. m. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organisation. 18(3), 429-472.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Atna Journal of Tourism Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
