Landing Page via Perceived Interactivity for Four Generational Cohorts


  • Mary Rani Thomas Department of Commerce, CHRIST (Deemed to be University)
  • Jain Mathew CHRIST (Deemed to be University)



Landing Page, Perceived Interactivity, Generation X, Generation Y, Generation Z, Alpha Generation


 Purpose- There are numerous online websites for buying products and services today. The challenge for marketers is to adopt the pull strategy, which attracts customers to the website and creates additional sales. This strategy can materialise only when innovation is brought in. A landing page on the web is considered to be the initial entry point for creating innovation. The current research paper emphasises the importance of creating a landing page for bringing innovation that caters to the four generations.

Design/method /approach-400 responses were obtained equally from male and female respondents of each generational category except the alpha generation. Data was collected through a survey using Google forms. The structural equation model was used for analysis, and generational age was considered the moderator.

Findings-There is a gradual shift in the generational pattern of perceiving and understanding technology to buy from the website. Being tech-savvy, in the case of generation Z the impact of perceived interactivity in creating purchase intention is very strong, followed by generation Y and generation X.

 Practical implications-Age plays a huge role in understanding the landing page leading to better purchase intention. Hence it is evident that a landing page that caters to all generations unambiguously has to be considered by marketers to boost sales.

Originality /value- The research results suggest that every generation seeks exclusivity on the landing page. So, generation-based perceived interactivity features on the landing page can attract all generations.

Keywords: Landing Page, Perceived Interactivity, Generation X, Generation Y, Generation Z and Alpha Generation.

Paper type-Research paper


Anand, A., Singh, O., Aggrawal, D., & Singh, J. (2014). An i-

-nteractive approach to determine optimal launch time of s-

-uccessive generational product. International Journal of Tech-

-nology Marketing, 9(4), 392-407.

Brand Equity. (2017). Jabong's newly launched 'The mood s-

-tore' will help you 'BeYou' ET BrandEquity.yRetrievedfrom newly-launched-the-mood-store- will-help-you-be-you/58789172

Cain, E. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.business2com


Chaney, D., Touzani, M., & Ben Slimane, K. (2017). Marketi-

-ng to the (new) generations: summary and perspectives.

Dhanapal, S., Vashu, D., & Subramaniam, T. (2015). Percept-

ions on the challenges of online purchasing: a study from “baby boomers”, generation “X” and generation “Y” point of views. Contaduría y Administración, 60, 107-132.

Econsultancy. (2017). Retrieved from https://econsultancy.


Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2003). Empiri-

cal testing of a modelofonlinestoreatmosphericsandshopper

responses. Psychology&Marketing, 20(2),139-150

Finn, A. (2018). 35 Marketing Statistics that Should Change Your Strategy in 2018 [Blog]. Retrieved from https://www. statistics

Fiore, A. M., & Jin, H. J. (2003). Influence of image interacti-

-vity on approach responses towards an online retailer.Inte-

-rnet retailer. Internet 13

Gardiner, S., King, C., & Grace, D. (2013). Travel decision m- -aking: An empirical examination of generational values, at-

-titudes, and intentions. Journal of Travel Research, 52(3), 310-324.

Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M., & Patel, V. (2014). AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool.

Heaney, J. G. (2007). Generations X and Y's internet banking usage in Australia. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 11(3), 196-210.

Jackson, V., Stoel, L., & Brantley, A. (2011). Mall attributes and shopping value: Differences by gender and generational cohort. Journal of retailing and consumer servic-

-es, 18(1), 1-9

Johnston, S. (2018). Why You Should Use Landing Pages for Yo- -ur Business - Soffront. [online]Soffront.Availableat: https:// pages-business/

Kamerman, J. (2018). What is a Landing Page and Its Benef-

-its to Your Small Business? Mesh. Live. Build. [online] Mes-

-h. Live.Build.Availableat:


Kanerva, A., Keeker, K., Risden, K., Schuh, E., & Czerwinski

M. (1997). Web usability research at Microsoft Corporation.

Human Factors for World Wide Web Development, Lawrence Erl- baum, New York, United States of America.

Karlsson, S., Kälvehed, A., & Sköld, M. (2014). Perception of advertising strategies: an X and Generation Y.

Kawaf, F., &Tagg, S. (2012). Online shopping environments in fashion shopping: An SOR based review. The Marketing Review, 12(2), 161-180.

Kim, D., & Ammeter, A. P. (2018). Shifts in online consumer

behavior: A preliminary investigation of the net generation. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 13(1), 1-25.doi: http://dx.18762018000100102.

Kozinsky, S. (2017). How generation Z is shaping the chan- ge in education. Retrieved 2nd August.

Leung, W. S. (2011). New Worlds of Work: Consequences of the Differential Effects of Generational Attitudes. Erasmus Universiteit.

Lewis, E. S. (1898). AIDA Sales Funnel.

Lissitsa, S., &Kol, O. (2016). Generation X vs. Generation Y–A decade of online shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 304-312

Mathwick, C. (2002). Understanding the online consumer: A typology of online relational norms and behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(1), 40-55.

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. the MIT Press.Merrilees, B., & Fry,

Neil,P.(2018).Beginner's Guide to Landing Pages.Retrieved-



Newhagen, J. E., Cordes, J. W., & Levy, M. R. (1995). Nightl-

-y@ nbc. com: Audience scope and the perception of interac- tivity in viewer mail on the Internet. Journal of communica-

-tion, 45(3),164-175

Online Shopping India - Shop Online for Branded Shoes, Cl-

-othing & Accessories in India | (2018). Retri-

-eved from

Park, J., Lennon, S. J., &Stoel, L. (2005). On‐line product pre-

sentation: Effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention. PsychologyMarketing, 22(9),695-719.



Pieri, M., &Diamantinir, D. (2010). Young people, elderly and ICT. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2422-2426.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, L. L. P. (2015). Total Retail 2015: Retailers and The Age of Disruption. Pricewaterhouse Disr-

uption. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PWC).

Radovic, Z. (2017). How to Create an Effective Landing Pag-

-e-eMarketing Institute. Retrieved from https://www.emar effective- landing- page

Ram, S., & Sheth, J. N. (1989). Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. Journal of consumer marketing, 6(2), 5-14.

Research and Markets: Perfecting the landing page – 2011 r--eport: Read, absorb, implement and profit with perfecting the landing page. (2012, Jan 03). M2 PresswireRetrievedfrom untid=38885

Shastry, K. (2017). How a Landing Page Benefits Your Bu-

sines. Retrieved from


Sorce, P., Perotti, V., & Widrick, S. (2005). Attitude and age differences in online buying. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(2), 122-132.

Steffens, R. (2018). 30 Landing Page Statistics Every Mark-

eter Needs to See. Retrieved from https://www.bluleadz.c-


Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions deter-

mining telepresence. Journal of communication, 42(4), 73-93

Tangmanee, C., & Rawsena, C. (2016). Direct and Indirect E-

-ffects of Perceived Risk and Website Reputation on Purcha-

-se Intention: The Mediating Role of Online Trust Internatio-

-nal Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4


Thomas, M. R., & Mathew, J. (2018). Online Merchandising Cues Influencing the Purchase Intention of Generation Z Mediated by Emotions Using-SOR Framework. Asian Journal of Management.

Thomas, M. R., Kavya, V., & Monica, M. (2018). Online web- -site cues influencing the purchase intention of generat-

-ion z mediated by trust. Indian Journal of Commerce and Ma- nagement Studies, 9(1), 13-23.

Williams, K. C., Page, R. A., Petrosky, A. R., & Hernandez, E. H. (2010). Multi- Generational Marketing: Descriptions, Characteristics, Lifestyles, and Attitudes. The Journal of Applied Bus

Wohl, R. (1979). The generation of 1914. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Wu, G. (1999, March). Perceived interactivity and attitude toward web sites. In Proceedings of the conference-American Academy of Advertising (pp. 254- 262). American Academy of Advertising

Wu, G. (2005). The mediating role of perceived interactivity in the effect of actual interactivity on attitude toward the website. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), 29-39.

Wu, G., & Wu, G. (2006).Conceptualizing and measuring

the perceived interactivity of websites. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 28(1), 87- 104.

Wu, J. (2014). Consumer Response to Online Visual Mercha-

-ndising Cues: A Case Study of Forever (Doctoral dissertati-


Wu, W. Y., Lee, C. L., Fu, C. S., & Wang, H. C. (2013). How can online store layout design and Atmospherics influence consumer shopping intention on a website? International Journal of Retail &Distribution Management, 42(1), 4-24.




How to Cite

Thomas, M. R. ., & Mathew, J. (2023). Landing Page via Perceived Interactivity for Four Generational Cohorts. Ushus Journal of Business Management, 22(3), 27-46.